Schoemaker C, van Strien T, van der Staak C
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Eat Disord. 1994 May;15(4):387-93. doi: 10.1002/eat.2260150409.
In the present study, the validity of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) in a Dutch nonclinical female school population was established. The data were analyzed in two ways. In the first analyses, the factorial integrity of the questionnaire, and the internal consistencies of the subscales were not found to be very satisfactory. The data showed an impressive lack of variability. It was suggested by the authors that in a nonclinical population the variability of the EDI data is being suppressed as a result of the fact that, in concordance with the manual, the original 6-point EDI items were transformed into 4-point items. In the second analyses, this item transformation was ejected. The psychometric properties of all EDI subscales in the present study improved. Implications for the use of the untransformed EDI as a screening instrument were discussed.
在本研究中,确定了饮食失调量表(EDI)在荷兰非临床女性学生群体中的有效性。数据采用两种方式进行分析。在首次分析中,问卷的因子完整性以及各分量表的内部一致性并不十分令人满意。数据显示出令人惊讶的缺乏变异性。作者认为,在非临床人群中,EDI数据的变异性受到抑制,原因是按照手册将原始的6分量表项目转换为了4分量表项目。在第二次分析中,排除了这种项目转换。本研究中所有EDI分量表的心理测量特性都有所改善。讨论了使用未转换的EDI作为筛查工具的意义。