Todd Michael, Tennen Howard, Carney Margaret Anne, Armeli Stephen, Affleck Glenn
Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-6325, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):310-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310.
The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress.
本研究考察了应对方式的日常报告、特质(整体回顾性)报告和限时回顾性报告之间的一致性。93名成年人的样本在连续30天记录应对当天最负面事件之前完成了应对方式问卷(C.S.卡弗、M.F.谢尔和J.K.温特劳布,1989)。在每日数据收集结束时,参与者回忆了他们在过去30天里使用16种应对策略中每种策略的程度。虽然研究结果表明日常报告和限时回顾性报告之间总体一致性良好,但整体报告和日常报告之间的一致性较弱。仅发现了关于一致性方面系统性个体差异的有限证据。限时报告似乎是确定应对压力的通常模式的一种适当方法,尽管并不理想。