Laughton C A, Neidle S
CRC Biomolecular Structure Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Dec 25;20(24):6535-41. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.24.6535.
Molecular mechanics has been used to predict the structure of the Y+.R-.R(+)-type DNA triple helix, in which a second polypurine strand binds antiparallel to the homopurine strand of a homopurine/homopyrimidine stretch of duplex DNA. From calculations on the sequence d(C)10.d(G)10.d(G)10, two likely structures emerge. One has the glycosidic torsions of the third strand bases in the anti-conformation and Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonds to the purine strand of the duplex, the other has the third strand purines in the syn orientation and uses a reverse-Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonding pattern. Despite the large structural differences between these two types of triplex, calculations performed in vacuo with a distance-dependent dielectric constant to mimic the shielding effect of solvent show them to be energetically very similar, with the latter (syn) slightly preferred. However, if explicit solvent molecules are included in the calculation, the anti conformation is found to be much preferred. This difference in the results seems to stem from an underestimation of short-range electrostatic interactions in the in vacuo simulations. When TAA or TAT base triples are substituted for the sixth CGG triple in the sequence, it is found that, for the solvated model, the third strand base of the TAA triple prefers the syn orientation while that in the TAT triple retains a preference, though reduced, for the anti conformation.
分子力学已被用于预测Y⁺.R⁻.R⁺型DNA三链螺旋的结构,其中第二条多聚嘌呤链与双链DNA中同聚嘌呤/同聚嘧啶区段的同聚嘌呤链反平行结合。通过对序列d(C)₁₀.d(G)₁₀.d(G)₁₀进行计算,出现了两种可能的结构。一种结构中,第三条链碱基的糖苷扭转处于反式构象,并通过Hoogsteen氢键与双链的嘌呤链结合;另一种结构中,第三条链的嘌呤处于顺式取向,并采用反向Hoogsteen氢键模式。尽管这两种类型的三链体在结构上存在很大差异,但在真空中使用距离依赖介电常数进行计算以模拟溶剂的屏蔽效应时,结果显示它们在能量上非常相似,后者(顺式)略占优势。然而,如果在计算中包含明确的溶剂分子,则发现反式构象更受青睐。结果的这种差异似乎源于真空中模拟中对短程静电相互作用的低估。当用TAA或TAT碱基三联体取代序列中的第六个CGG三联体时,发现对于溶剂化模型,TAA三联体的第三条链碱基更倾向于顺式取向,而TAT三联体的第三条链碱基虽然对反式构象的偏好有所降低,但仍然保持这种偏好。