Peterson K L, Tsuji J, Johnson A, DiDonna J, LeWinter M
Circulation. 1978 Jul;58(1):77-89. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.1.77.
Left ventricular (LV) chamber and myocardial stiffness were determined in 17 patients, four subjects with normal LV function and 13 subjects with valvular aortic stenosis and concentric myocardial hypertrophy, using simultaneous catheter micromanometry and LV cineangiography. Pressure (P), volume (V), and wall thickness (h) were measured. Variability in both chamber and myocardial stiffness parameters was found with five of the aortic stenosis patients (Group 1, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure = 15 +/- 2 (SEM) mm Hg) exhibiting normal values for end-diastolic dP/dV and dP/dV/V, for chamber stiffness constants (a,a') derived from P-V and normalized P-V relations, respectively, for end-diastolic myocardial elastic stiffness (ES or EE, where S = spherical model and E = ellipsoidal model) at the midwall of the minor axis circumference, and for the myocardial stiffness constants (KS or KE) of the circumferential stress-strain relation. Eight other patients with aortic stenosis (Group II, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure = 20 +/- 3 (SEM) mm Hg) exhibited significant increases in end-diastolic dP/dV,dP/dV/V,ES and EE and a tendency for increase in the chamber stiffness constants (a,a') and myocardial stiffness constants (KS, KE). These observations suggest that concentric increase in muscle mass (increase in wall thickness/minor axis radius ratio and wall volume/chamber volume ratio) is an important determinant of elevated mid- and late diastolic pressures in patients with valvular aortic stenosis, while concurrently mitigating increases in both systolic and diastolic wall stress. In some patients with aortic stenosis, however, diastolic filling pressures are elevated more severely, not only as a result of concentric hypertrophy, but also in response to augmented muscle stiffness. Reversibility of increased ventricular diastolic stiffness and elevated filling pressures was documented as concentric hypertrophy regressed post-aortic valve replacement in one patient, suggesting that fibrosis is not invariably the cause of enhanced myocardial stiffness in this secondary and compensatory form of hypertrophy.
采用同步导管微测法和左心室电影血管造影术,对17例患者进行了左心室(LV)腔和心肌僵硬度的测定,其中4例左心室功能正常,13例患有瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄并伴有同心性心肌肥厚。测量了压力(P)、容积(V)和壁厚(h)。发现主动脉瓣狭窄患者中有5例(第1组,左心室舒张末期压力=15±2(SEM)mmHg)的腔和心肌僵硬度参数存在变异性,其舒张末期dP/dV和dP/dV/V、分别从P-V和标准化P-V关系得出的腔僵硬度常数(a,a')、短轴圆周中壁处的舒张末期心肌弹性僵硬度(ES或EE,其中S=球形模型,E=椭圆形模型)以及圆周应力-应变关系的心肌僵硬度常数(KS或KE)均为正常值。另外8例主动脉瓣狭窄患者(第II组,左心室舒张末期压力=20±3(SEM)mmHg)的舒张末期dP/dV、dP/dV/V、ES和EE显著升高,腔僵硬度常数(a,a')和心肌僵硬度常数(KS,KE)有升高趋势。这些观察结果表明,肌肉质量的同心性增加(壁厚/短轴半径比和壁容积/腔容积比增加)是瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄患者舒张中期和晚期压力升高的重要决定因素,同时可减轻收缩期和舒张期壁应力的增加。然而,在一些主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,舒张期充盈压力升高更为严重,这不仅是由于同心性肥厚,还与肌肉僵硬度增加有关。在1例患者中,随着主动脉瓣置换术后同心性肥厚消退,记录到心室舒张僵硬度增加和充盈压力升高的可逆性,这表明在这种继发性和代偿性肥厚形式中,纤维化并非总是心肌僵硬度增加的原因。