Graham J, Walker K D, Berry M, Bryan E F, Callahan M A, Fan A, Finley B, Lynch J, McKone T, Ozkaynak H
Harvard School of Public Health Center for Risk Analysis, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arch Environ Health. 1992 Nov-Dec;47(6):408-20. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1992.9938382.
Risk assessments have assumed an increasingly important role in the management of risks in this country. The determination of which pollutants or public health issues are to be regulated, the degree and extent of regulation, and the priority assigned to particular problems are all areas of risk assessment that influence the country's $100 billion annual investment in environmental protection. Recent trends in public policy have brought the practice of risk assessment under greater scrutiny. As policy makers increasingly insist that specific numerical risk levels (so-called bright lines) be incorporated into regulatory decisions, the stakes for good risk assessment practice, already high, are raised even further. Enhancing the scientific basis of risk assessments was a major goal of the Workshop on Exposure Databases. In this article, we present the Risk Assessment Work Group's evaluation of the use of exposurerelated databases in risk assessment and the group's recommendations for improvement. The work group's discussion focused on the availability, suitability, and quality of data that underly exposure assessments, a critical component of risk assessment. The work group established a framework for evaluation, based on exposure scenarios typically used in regulatory decisions. The scenarios included examples from Superfund, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and other regulatory programs. These scenarios were used to illustrate current use of exposure data, to highlight gaps in existing data sources, and to discuss how improved exposure information can improve risk assessments. The work group concluded that many of the databases available are designed for purposes that do not meet exposure and risk assessment needs. Substantial gaps exist in measurements of actual human exposure and in the data necessary to model exposures, to characterize distributions of exposure, to identify high-risk groups, and to identify possible environmental inequities in exposure. The work group, on the basis of its findings, made both short-term and longer-term recommendations for improving the collection of exposure data in the future.
风险评估在该国的风险管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。确定哪些污染物或公共卫生问题需要监管、监管的程度和范围,以及赋予特定问题的优先级,这些都是风险评估的领域,会影响该国每年1000亿美元的环境保护投资。公共政策的最新趋势使风险评估实践受到了更严格的审查。随着政策制定者越来越坚持将特定的数值风险水平(所谓的明确界限)纳入监管决策,原本就很高的良好风险评估实践的利害关系被进一步提高。加强风险评估的科学基础是暴露数据库研讨会的一个主要目标。在本文中,我们介绍了风险评估工作组对风险评估中与暴露相关数据库使用情况的评估以及该小组的改进建议。工作组的讨论集中在构成风险评估关键组成部分的暴露评估所依据的数据的可用性、适用性和质量上。工作组基于监管决策中通常使用的暴露情景建立了一个评估框架。这些情景包括来自超级基金、《清洁空气法》、《有毒物质控制法》和其他监管计划的例子。这些情景被用来阐明暴露数据的当前使用情况,突出现有数据源中的差距,并讨论如何改进暴露信息以改善风险评估。工作组得出结论,现有的许多数据库是为不符合暴露和风险评估需求的目的而设计的。在实际人类暴露的测量以及用于模拟暴露、描述暴露分布、识别高风险群体和识别暴露中可能存在的环境不公平所需的数据方面存在重大差距。工作组根据其调查结果,就未来改进暴露数据的收集提出了短期和长期建议。