Widlak P A, Greenley J R, McKee D
Mental Health Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
Community Ment Health J. 1992 Dec;28(6):505-17. doi: 10.1007/BF00754195.
Validity of case manager reports of client functioning in the community was assessed by examining the correspondence between case manager reports and client reports of several widely-used indicators of client well-being, including independent living, income, employment, family contact, and problem behaviors. Effects of how well case managers knew their clients and of using telephone interviews vs. self-administered questionnaires to gather case manager data were also investigated. Data were gathered from 6 case managers and 55 of their seriously mentally ill clients in a rural Wisconsin Community Support Program. Indicators of independent living and employment displayed reasonably good agreement and support the use of case manager reports in research. Indicators of income and problem behaviors produced lower levels of client-case manager agreement at least in part because client reports proved an inadequate criterion for these measures.
通过检查个案管理员报告与服务对象报告之间关于几个广泛使用的服务对象福祉指标(包括独立生活、收入、就业、家庭联系和问题行为)的一致性,评估了个案管理员关于服务对象在社区中功能状况报告的有效性。还调查了个案管理员对服务对象的了解程度以及使用电话访谈与自行填写问卷来收集个案管理员数据的影响。数据来自威斯康星州农村社区支持项目中的6名个案管理员及其55名重度精神疾病服务对象。独立生活和就业指标显示出相当好的一致性,并支持在研究中使用个案管理员报告。收入和问题行为指标的服务对象与个案管理员的一致性较低,至少部分原因是服务对象报告被证明是这些指标的不充分标准。