Sato T, Sakado K, Sato S
Department of Psychiatry, Niigata City General Hospital, Japan.
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1992 Sep;46(3):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1992.tb00534.x.
We examined the validity in various settings of two questionnaires for assessment of Typus melancholicus, F-list and Kasahara's scale, and characterological differences between the questionnaires, based on data in 69 patients with unipolar depression and 386 normal controls without a history of depression. The questionnaires were performed on both groups. In addition, a diagnosis of DSM-III-R personality disorders was done for the patient group. Our results demonstrated that Kasahara's scale has much more stable validity in various settings for distinction between personalities of the two groups, and that high scorers in Kasahara's scale have more obsessionality and less personality instability than those in F-list. Such differences between the questionnaires suggested that a direct international comparison of premorbid personality of unipolar depressive patients is needed.
我们基于69例单相抑郁症患者和386例无抑郁病史的正常对照的数据，检验了用于评估抑郁型人格的两份问卷（F量表和笠原量表）在不同情境下的效度，以及两份问卷之间的性格差异。两组均进行了问卷测评。此外，对患者组进行了DSM-III-R人格障碍的诊断。我们的结果表明，笠原量表在区分两组人格的不同情境下具有更稳定的效度，且笠原量表得分高者比F量表得分高者具有更多的强迫观念和更少的人格不稳定性。两份问卷之间的这种差异表明，需要对单相抑郁患者的病前人格进行直接的国际比较。
