Hecht H, van Calker D, Spraul G, Bohus M, Wark H J, Berger M, von Zerssen D
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;247(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02916249.
The relationship between premorbid personality and subtypes of affective disorder was investigated by means of the Biographical Personality Interview (BPI) and by a self-rating scale. Interviewer and rater (BPI) were blind to diagnosis. A total of 52 patients with unipolar depression or bipolar II disorder (D/Dm), 32 bipolar-I patients (DM) and 39 control subjects (C) were examined. Expert rating of "typus melancholicus" features (BPI) were found to be more pronounced in D/Dm than in DM and C. "Typus manicus" features were also distinguished between both clinical groups, whereas anxious-insecure features were not significantly different between the groups of patients. In contrast to the expert-rated personality variants, self-rating of personality features did not reveal any significant differences between the two clinical groups. Potential sources of the discrepancies between the questionnaire data and the interview data are discussed. It is concluded that premorbid features of "typus manicus" and "typus melancholicus" predicted, respectively, a predominant manic and a predominant depressive course of an affective disorder.
通过传记式人格访谈(BPI)和自评量表对病前人格与情感障碍亚型之间的关系进行了研究。访谈者和评分者(BPI)对诊断情况不知情。共检查了52例单相抑郁症或双相II型障碍患者(D/Dm)、32例双相I型患者(DM)和39例对照者(C)。发现“抑郁型”特征(BPI)的专家评分在D/Dm组比在DM组和C组中更为明显。“躁狂型”特征在两个临床组之间也有区别,而焦虑 - 不安全特征在患者组之间无显著差异。与专家评定的人格变体不同,人格特征的自评在两个临床组之间未显示出任何显著差异。讨论了问卷数据与访谈数据之间差异的潜在来源。得出的结论是,“躁狂型”和“抑郁型”的病前特征分别预测了情感障碍的主要躁狂和主要抑郁病程。