Suppr超能文献

[The reuse of 29-gauge spinal needles following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia].

作者信息

Möllmann M, Lübbesmeyer H, Holst D, Vandermeersch E, van Aken H

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1992 Dec;41(12):769-71.

PMID:1489076
Abstract

The technique of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (CSE) combines the versatility of spinal with the variability of epidural anaesthesia. Spinal application of the local anaesthetic achieves a fast response, reliable sensorial and motor block at a low dose with little toxicity. The epidural catheter allows for the duration of surgical anaesthesia to be extended and provides analgesia for the postoperative period. As the incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is inversely related to the size of the spinal needle, PDPH rarely or never occurs when 29 gauge needles are used. In 1775 parturients receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, Dittmann et al. [4] reported an incidence of PDPH of 1.37% with 29 gauge needles. The 29 gauge needle produced by Becton-Dickinson is the one now most frequently used for this technique. It is recommended that these needles be reused after resterilization. The objective of this study was to examine how clean 29 gauge spinal needles really are after resterilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifteen needles (29 gauge; Becton-Dickinson) were routinely used for combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. After identification of the epidural space at the L3-4 spinal segment with the 18 gauge Tuohy needle, the 29 gauge needle was advanced through the Tuohy needle. Immediately after use the needles were cleaned, rinsed with 20 ml distilled water, dried with pressurized air and subsequently resterilized in gas. Preparation of the used needles was in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations ("wash, rinse, dry, sterilize before initial and each subsequent use") and with generally accepted principles [6]. Two needles were additionally cleaned in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The needles were examined using a scanning electron microscope. After this analyses, eight needles were sterilized again and then taken for hygienic examination. They were incubated with trypticase soy broth and checked for bacterial growth. RESULTS. Scanning electron microscopy (ScEM) showed organic impurities on all needles. These impurities were equally distributed among all needles. Even the two cleaned in the ultrasonic bath were not free of organic particles. However, no material defects or damage could be seen. Hygienic evaluation proved sterility as no bacterial growth could be detected. CONCLUSION. Owing to the possibility of medico-legal consequences, which sometimes occur a long time after anaesthesia has been given, we think it is unwise to reuse such needles. We hope that disposable and cheap 29 gauge needles will soon become available.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验