Mejàre Ingegerd, Lingström Peter, Petersson Lars G, Holm Anna-Karin, Twetman Svante, Källestål Carina, Nordenram Gunilla, Lagerlöf Folke, Söder Birgitta, Norlund Anders, Axelsson Susanna, Dahlgren Helena
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):321-30. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007581.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate systematically the evidence of the caries-preventive effect of fissure sealing of occlusal tooth surfaces and to examine factors potentially modifying the effect. The search strategies included electronic databases, reference lists of articles, and selected textbooks. Inclusion criteria were randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials comparing fissure sealing with no treatment or another preventive treatment in children up to 14 years of age at the start; the outcome measure was caries increment; the diagnostic criteria had been described; and the follow-up time was at least 2 years. Inclusion decisions were taken and grading of the studies was done independently by two of the authors. The main measure of effect was relative risk reduction. Thirteen studies using resin-based or glass ionomer sealant materials were included in the final analysis. The results showed that most studies were performed during the 1970s and a single application had been utilized. The relative caries risk reduction pooled estimate of resin-based sealants on permanent 1st molars was 33% (relative risk = 0.67; CI = 0.55-0.83). The effect depended on retention of the sealant. In conclusion, the review suggests limited evidence that fissure sealing of 1st permanent molars with resin-based materials has a caries-preventive effect. The evidence is incomplete for permanent 2nd molars, premolars and primary molars and for glass ionomer cements. Overall, there remains a need for further trials of high quality, particularly in child populations with a low and a high caries risk, respectively.
本研究的目的是系统评估窝沟封闭对磨牙咬合面的防龋效果证据,并研究可能影响该效果的因素。检索策略包括电子数据库、文章参考文献列表和选定的教科书。纳入标准为随机或半随机临床试验或对照临床试验,比较在研究开始时年龄在14岁及以下儿童中窝沟封闭与未治疗或其他预防治疗的效果;观察指标为龋病增量;已描述诊断标准;随访时间至少为2年。纳入决策由两位作者独立做出,研究分级也由他们独立完成。主要疗效指标为相对危险度降低。最终分析纳入了13项使用树脂基或玻璃离子水门汀封闭剂材料的研究。结果表明,大多数研究在20世纪70年代进行,且仅采用单次应用。树脂基封闭剂对恒牙第一磨牙的相对龋病风险降低合并估计值为33%(相对危险度=0.67;可信区间=0.55-0.83)。效果取决于封闭剂的保留情况。总之,该综述表明,有限的证据显示用树脂基材料对第一恒磨牙进行窝沟封闭有防龋效果。对于第二恒磨牙、前磨牙和乳磨牙以及玻璃离子水门汀,证据不完整。总体而言,仍需要进一步开展高质量试验,特别是分别针对龋病低风险和高风险儿童群体的试验。