Galatz Leesa M, Ball Craig M, Teefey Sharlene A, Middleton William D, Yamaguchi Ken
Shoulder and Elbow Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300, West Pavilion, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00002.
The impact of a recurrent defect on the outcome after rotator cuff repair has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and anatomic results after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with use of ultrasound as an imaging modality to determine the postoperative integrity of the repair.
Eighteen patients who had complete arthroscopic repair of a tear measuring >2 cm in the transverse dimension were evaluated at a minimum of twelve months after surgery and again at two years after surgery. The evaluation consisted of a standardized history and physical examination as well as calculation of the preoperative and postoperative shoulder scores according to the system of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. The strength of both shoulders was quantitated postoperatively with use of a portable dynamometer. Ultrasound studies were performed with use of an established and validated protocol at a minimum of twelve months after surgery.
Recurrent tears were seen in seventeen of the eighteen patients. Despite the absence of healing at twelve months after surgery, thirteen patients had an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of >/=90 points. Sixteen patients had an improvement in the functional outcome score, which increased from an average of 48.3 to 84.6 points. Sixteen patients had a decrease in pain, and twelve had no pain. Although eight patients had preoperative forward elevation to <95 degrees, all eighteen regained motion above shoulder level and had an average of 152 degrees of elevation. At the second evaluation, a minimum of twenty-four months after surgery, the average score, according to the system of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, had decreased to 79.9 points; only nine patients had a score of >/=90 points, and six patients had a score of </=79 points. The average forward elevation decreased to 142 degrees.
Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears led to a high percentage of recurrent defects. The minimum twelve-month evaluation showed excellent pain relief and improvement in the ability to perform activities of daily living despite the high rate of recurrent defects; however, at a minimum follow-up of two years, the results deteriorated with only twelve patients who had an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of >/=80.
复发性肩袖损伤对肩袖修复术后结果的影响一直存在争议。本研究的目的是通过使用超声作为成像方式来评估关节镜修复大型和巨大型肩袖撕裂术后的功能和解剖学结果,以确定修复术后的完整性。
对18例经关节镜完全修复横径大于2 cm撕裂伤的患者进行评估,术后至少随访12个月,并在术后2年再次评估。评估包括标准化病史和体格检查,以及根据美国肩肘外科医师协会系统计算术前和术后的肩部评分。术后使用便携式测力计对双肩力量进行定量测定。术后至少12个月按照既定且经过验证的方案进行超声检查。
18例患者中有17例出现复发性撕裂。尽管术后12个月时未愈合,但13例患者的美国肩肘外科医师协会评分为≥90分。16例患者的功能结果评分有所改善,从平均48.3分提高到84.6分。16例患者疼痛减轻,12例患者无疼痛。虽然8例患者术前前屈上举角度小于95度,但所有18例患者均恢复了高于肩部水平的活动度,平均上举角度为152度。在第二次评估时,术后至少24个月,根据美国肩肘外科医师协会系统,平均评分降至79.9分;只有9例患者评分≥90分,6例患者评分≤79分。平均前屈上举角度降至142度。
关节镜修复大型和巨大型肩袖撕裂导致复发性损伤的比例较高。术后至少12个月的评估显示,尽管复发性损伤发生率较高,但疼痛缓解良好,日常生活活动能力有所改善;然而,至少随访2年时,结果有所恶化,只有12例患者的美国肩肘外科医师协会评分为≥80分。