• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)的评分者间信度。

Inter-rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS).

作者信息

Storey Elsdon, Tuck Kate, Hester Robert, Hughes Andrew, Churchyard Andrew

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Neuroscience), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 2004 Feb;19(2):190-2. doi: 10.1002/mds.10657.

DOI:10.1002/mds.10657
PMID:14978674
Abstract

We assessed the inter-rater reliability of the 100-point International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Three neurologists independently rated videotaped ICARS examinations of 22 subjects with genetically determined ataxias (spinocerebellar ataxia [SCA] Type 1 in 11; SCA Type 2 in 1; Friedreich's ataxia in 10) and 4 controls. Scores on live ICARS assessment had ranged from 0 to 7 for controls and 11 to 74 for ataxic subjects (clinically very mildly affected to wheelchair-bound). Inter-rater correlation was very high for the total score (Kendall's omega 0.994, 95% confidence interval, 0.988-0.997), and high to very high for each component subscore (0.791 for speech to 0.994 for posture/gait). All correlations were significant at P < 0.00001. The ICARS exhibits very high inter-rater reliability even without prior observer standardisation and is sensitive to a range of ataxia severities from very mild to severe.

摘要

我们评估了100分制国际协作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)的评分者间信度。三位神经科医生独立对22例遗传性共济失调患者(11例1型脊髓小脑共济失调[SCA1];1例2型脊髓小脑共济失调[SCA2];10例弗里德赖希共济失调)和4例对照者的ICARS检查录像进行评分。对照者现场ICARS评估得分范围为0至7分,共济失调患者为11至74分(临床症状从非常轻微到需要轮椅辅助)。评分者间总分的相关性非常高(肯德尔ω系数为0.994,95%置信区间为0.988 - 0.997),各分量表得分的相关性高至极高(言语分量表为0.791,姿势/步态分量表为0.994)。所有相关性在P < 0.00001时均具有显著性。即使没有事先对观察者进行标准化,ICARS也表现出非常高的评分者间信度,并且对从非常轻微到严重的一系列共济失调严重程度都很敏感。

相似文献

1
Inter-rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS).国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)的评分者间信度。
Mov Disord. 2004 Feb;19(2):190-2. doi: 10.1002/mds.10657.
2
International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): appropriate for studies of Friedreich's ataxia?国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS):适用于弗里德赖希共济失调的研究吗?
Mov Disord. 2005 Dec;20(12):1585-91. doi: 10.1002/mds.20651.
3
Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients.国际合作共济失调评定量表的信度和效度:156例脊髓小脑共济失调患者的研究
Mov Disord. 2006 May;21(5):699-704. doi: 10.1002/mds.20781.
4
Validating an Ataxia Functional Composite Scale in spinocerebellar ataxia.验证脊髓小脑共济失调中的共济失调功能综合量表
J Neurol Sci. 2008 May 15;268(1-2):136-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.11.016. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
5
Comparison of three clinical rating scales in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA).三种临床评定量表在弗里德赖希共济失调(FRDA)中的比较。
Mov Disord. 2009 Sep 15;24(12):1779-84. doi: 10.1002/mds.22660.
6
Usefulness of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的效用
J Neurol Sci. 2008 Mar 15;266(1-2):164-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.09.021. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Application of the International Cooperative Ataxia Scale rating in multiple system atrophy.国际合作性共济失调量表评分在多系统萎缩中的应用。
Mov Disord. 2002 Nov;17(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1002/mds.10290.
8
[Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)].[日本版共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的可靠性]
Brain Nerve. 2009 May;61(5):591-5.
9
The international cooperative ataxia rating scale in Machado-Joseph disease. Comparison with the unified multiple system atrophy rating scale.马查多-约瑟夫病的国际合作共济失调评定量表。与统一多系统萎缩评定量表的比较。
Mov Disord. 2007 Oct 15;22(13):1976-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21735.
10
Quantitative evaluation of balance in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: a case control study.脊髓小脑共济失调1型患者平衡功能的定量评估:一项病例对照研究。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Jul;15(6):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of neurological and cerebellar soft signs on psychosocial functioning in bipolar disorder.神经学和小脑软体征对双相情感障碍患者心理社会功能的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 30;16:1632857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1632857. eCollection 2025.
2
Distribution of perivascular spaces distribution and relate to the clinical features of SCA3.血管周围间隙分布及其与SCA3临床特征的关系
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 11;20(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03954-3.
3
Quantitative Brain MRI Analysis in Neurodegenerative Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis.
神经退行性朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增多症的定量脑磁共振成像分析
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70249. doi: 10.1111/ene.70249.
4
The Pattern and Stages of Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.2型脊髓小脑共济失调萎缩的模式与阶段:来自ENIGMA-共济失调研究的容积分析
Mov Disord. 2025 Apr;40(4):651-661. doi: 10.1002/mds.30143. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
5
Causally Mapping the Cerebellum in Children and Young Adults: from Motor to Cognition.因果映射儿童和年轻人的小脑:从运动到认知
Cerebellum. 2025 Jan 16;24(2):31. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01778-8.
6
Inter-rater Agreement for Movement Disorder Classification in Children with Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders.多动性运动障碍儿童运动障碍分类的评分者间一致性
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;11(12):1598-1603. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14252. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
7
The Pattern and Staging of Brain Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): MRI Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.2型脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA2)脑萎缩的模式与分期:来自ENIGMA共济失调研究的MRI容积分析
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 17:2024.09.16.613281. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613281.
8
Consensus framework for conducting phase I/II clinical trials for children, adolescents, and young adults with pediatric low-grade glioma: Guidelines established by the International Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Coalition Clinical Trial Working Group.儿童、青少年和青年低级别脑胶质瘤患者进行 I/II 期临床试验的共识框架:国际儿科低级别脑胶质瘤联盟临床试验工作组制定的指南。
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;26(3):407-416. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad227.
9
Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激对遗传性共济失调的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cerebellum. 2024 Aug;23(4):1614-1625. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01638-x. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
10
Clinical Motor Coordination Tests in Adult Neurology: A Scoping Review.成人神经病学中的临床运动协调测试:一项范围综述。
Physiother Can. 2022 Aug 24;74(4):387-395. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0025. eCollection 2022 Nov.