Sibila Marina, Calsamiglia Maria, Vidal Dolors, Badiella Llorenç, Aldaz Alvaro, Jensen Jens C
Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal, Edifici V, Campus de Bellaterra, UAB 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Can J Vet Res. 2004 Jan;68(1):12-8.
This study had 2 objectives: 1) to determine the involvement of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in respiratory outbreaks in herds of pigs, with the use of a nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); and 2) to determine if the dynamics of M. hyopneumoniae infection differ between 3-site versus 1- or 2-site production systems (in which at least farrowing/gestation and nursery pigs are on the same site). Animals of different ages from 12 Spanish farms with respiratory problems were randomly sampled. Blood samples and nasal swabs were collected in a single farm visit, and ELISA and nPCR tests, respectively, were performed. All the farms demonstrated M. hyopneumoniae. According to the proportions of infected animals and the appearance of clinical signs in the different age groups, the farms were divided into 2 groups: farms in which M. hyopneumoniae probably played an important role in the observed respiratory outbreak and farms in which M. hyopneumoniae was not the main agent involved in the outbreak. Although seroconversion occurred in most herds in the finishing units, the number of seropositive pigs in the first group of farms was greater than the number in the second group. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) between farms with a 1- or 2-site production system versus those with a 3-site production system were detected in nPCR results but not in rates of seroconversion. The farm effect also had a great influence on both controlled parameters: the pathogen's DNA and antibody detection. Thus, although M. hyopneumoniae was present in all the studied farms, there were significant differences in the infection dynamics and clinical implications according to the type of production system, and M. hyopneumoniae colonization and seroconversion were greatly influenced by the effect of the individual farm.
1)使用巢式聚合酶链反应(nPCR)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来确定猪肺炎支原体在猪群呼吸道疾病暴发中的作用;2)确定在三点式与一点式或两点式生产系统(其中至少分娩/妊娠猪和保育猪在同一地点)中,猪肺炎支原体感染的动态变化是否存在差异。从12个有呼吸道问题的西班牙农场中随机选取不同年龄的猪进行采样。在单次农场访问中采集血样和鼻拭子,分别进行ELISA和nPCR检测。所有农场均检测出猪肺炎支原体。根据不同年龄组中感染动物的比例和临床症状的出现情况,将农场分为两组:猪肺炎支原体可能在观察到的呼吸道疾病暴发中起重要作用的农场,以及猪肺炎支原体不是疾病暴发主要病原体的农场。尽管育肥单元中的大多数猪群发生了血清转化,但第一组农场中血清阳性猪的数量多于第二组。在nPCR结果中检测到一点式或两点式生产系统的农场与三点式生产系统的农场之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.0001),但在血清转化率方面未检测到差异。农场效应也对两个控制参数有很大影响:病原体DNA和抗体检测。因此,尽管在所研究的所有农场中都存在猪肺炎支原体,但根据生产系统类型,感染动态和临床意义存在显著差异,并且猪肺炎支原体的定植和血清转化受到单个农场效应的极大影响。