Goldstein Bram, Obrzut John E, John Cameron, Ledakis George, Armstrong Carol L
Gynecologic Oncology Associates, Hoag Memorial Hospital, 351 Hospital Road, Suite 507, Newport Beach, CA 92663, USA.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Mar;54(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00269-0.
Several lesion and imaging studies have suggested that the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a measure of executive dysfunction. However, some studies have reported that this measure has poor anatomical specificity because patients with either frontal or non-frontal focal lesions exhibit similar performance. This study examined 25 frontal, 20 non-frontal low-grade brain tumor patients, and 63 normal controls (NC) on the WCST. The frontal patients were also assigned to either a left frontal (n=10) group or a right frontal group (n=15) and compared with the non-frontal group and NC. It was hypothesized that the frontal brain tumor patients would display greater deficits on categories achieved and a higher number of perseverative errors than non-frontal brain tumor patients on the WCST. Finally, it was predicted that right frontal brain tumors would result in greater executive functioning deficits than left frontal or non-frontal brain tumors. Results indicated that the left frontal group achieved the fewest categories and committed the most perseverative errors compared to the other patient and normal control groups. In addition, the left frontal group committed significantly more perseverative errors than the right frontal group. These results suggest that the WCST is sensitive to the effects of low-grade brain tumors on executive functioning.
多项病变及影像学研究表明,威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)是一种执行功能障碍的测量方法。然而,一些研究报告称,这种测量方法的解剖学特异性较差,因为额叶或非额叶局灶性病变的患者表现出相似的测验成绩。本研究对25名额叶、20名非额叶低级别脑肿瘤患者以及63名正常对照者(NC)进行了WCST测试。额叶患者还被分为左额叶组(n = 10)或右额叶组(n = 15),并与非额叶组和正常对照组进行比较。研究假设,在WCST测试中,额叶脑肿瘤患者在分类完成情况方面的缺陷会比非额叶脑肿瘤患者更大,且持续性错误的数量会更多。最后,研究预测右额叶脑肿瘤导致的执行功能缺陷会比左额叶或非额叶脑肿瘤更大。结果表明,与其他患者组和正常对照组相比,左额叶组完成的分类最少,持续性错误最多。此外,左额叶组的持续性错误显著多于右额叶组。这些结果表明,WCST对低级别脑肿瘤对执行功能的影响较为敏感。