Baillard Christophe, Bourdiau Sylvie, Le Toumelin Philippe, Ait Kaci Farid, Riou Bruno, Cupa Michel, Samama C Marc
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France.
Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):854-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000100150.84698.8c.
Postoperative awake patients may have significant residual neuromuscular block. In awake patients, the results of accelerometry are affected by extra movements to which the thumb may be subject. In this study, we evaluated the repeatability of train-of-four (TOF) ratio using acceleromyography in 253 patients recovering from anesthesia. Immediately after arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, the ulnar nerve was stimulated with TOF stimulation. The evoked response at the thumb was measured by the TOF-Watch apparatus. The current intensity was 30 mA. Two TOF stimulations were applied and recorded at 30-s intervals. A Bland-Altman test was used. The Kappa (kappa) test for clinical agreement between the two measurements was also calculated according to the presence or absence of a residual neuromuscular blockade, defined as a TOF ratio <0.9. According to the presence of a residual neuromuscular blockade, the paired TOF ratios were discordant in 61 patients (24%; 95% confidence interval, 21%-27%). The kappa test indicated a moderate agreement (k = 0.47). We demonstrated that accelerometry as used in this study is not always accurate. Two isolated acceleromyograph TOF ratios are not an accurate representation of the neuromuscular status of the patient recovering from anesthesia.
Clinicians should be aware that acceleromyography as used in this study does not always provide precise train-of-four ratio measurements. Two isolated acceleromyograph train-of-four ratios are not an accurate representation of the neuromuscular status of the patient recovering from anesthesia.
术后清醒患者可能存在显著的残余神经肌肉阻滞。在清醒患者中,加速度测量的结果会受到拇指可能出现的额外运动的影响。在本研究中,我们评估了253例麻醉恢复患者使用加速度描记法测量四个成串刺激(TOF)比值的可重复性。在到达麻醉后护理单元后,立即用TOF刺激法刺激尺神经。用TOF监护仪测量拇指处的诱发反应。电流强度为30毫安。每隔30秒进行两次TOF刺激并记录。采用Bland-Altman检验。还根据是否存在残余神经肌肉阻滞(定义为TOF比值<0.9)计算两次测量之间临床一致性的Kappa(κ)检验。根据是否存在残余神经肌肉阻滞,61例患者(24%;95%置信区间,21%-27%)的配对TOF比值不一致。κ检验表明一致性中等(κ = 0.47)。我们证明本研究中使用的加速度测量并不总是准确的。两次独立的加速度描记法TOF比值并不能准确反映麻醉恢复患者的神经肌肉状态。
临床医生应意识到,本研究中使用的加速度描记法并不总是能提供精确的四个成串刺激比值测量。两次独立的加速度描记法四个成串刺激比值并不能准确反映麻醉恢复患者的神经肌肉状态。