Suppr超能文献

Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial.

作者信息

Marsden Jo, Bradburn Jane

机构信息

Academic Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):6-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00232.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To show breast cancer patient involvement in the design of a national randomized trial of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in symptomatic patients will increase accrual.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Three stakeholder groups [(1) researchers from the Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, (2) the Consumers' Advisory Group for Clinical Trials (CAG-CT), (3) clinicians responsible for a pilot randomized HRT study in breast cancer patients] developed this collaborative study.

METHODS

(1) Nine focus group discussions were conducted to identify issues relevant to breast cancer patients about HRT and a national trial: six involved women from breast cancer support groups nationwide and three patients who had previously participated in the pilot randomized HRT study. (2) Recommendations from the focus groups (analysed by Grounded Theory) were debated by the research stakeholders and focus group representatives at a 1-day meeting and consensus reached (using a voting system) on mutual priorities for incorporation into the design of a national HRT trial. (3) Representatives from the CAG-CT and focus groups participated in subsequent national HRT steering committee meetings to ensure that these priorities were accounted for and the resulting trial design summary was circulated to the CAG-CT and all focus group representatives for comment.

RESULTS

Focus groups demonstrated that the complexity of factors relating to trial participation was not just restricted to the research topic in question. Patient-clinician interaction provided a platform for negotiating potential conflicts over trial design and outcomes. Patient feedback suggested that mutually agreed priorities were accounted for in the trial design.

INTERPRETATION

Clinical research planning should involve all research stakeholders at the outset. Quantifying the impact of patient involvement in terms of trial accrual may be too simple given the complexity of their motivations for participating in trials.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial.
Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):6-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00232.x.
2
Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible?
Fertil Steril. 2000 Feb;73(2):292-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00510-5.
3
Evidence from randomised trials on the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy.
Lancet. 2002 Sep 21;360(9337):942-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11032-4.
9
A case-control study of hormone replacement therapy after primary surgical breast cancer treatment.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Apr;25(2):146-51. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1998.0617.
10
Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: 10 year follow up of the Stockholm randomised trial.
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Building advocacy into research.
Dis Model Mech. 2023 Dec 1;16(12). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050646. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Multidisciplinary Shared Decision Making for Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer.
J Breast Cancer. 2023 Dec;26(6):582-592. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e44. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Beyond Participation: Evaluating the Role of Patients in Designing Oncology Clinical Trials.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 8;30(9):8310-8327. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090603.
4
Understanding the barriers to, and facilitators of, ovarian toxicity assessment in breast cancer clinical trials.
Breast. 2022 Aug;64:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Barriers and facilitators of clinical trial enrollment in a network of community-based pediatric oncology clinics.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Apr;67(4):e28023. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28023. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
User involvement in digital health: Working together to design smart home health technology.
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/hex.12831. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Consumers and trials.
Lancet. 2001 Sep 1;358(9283):763-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05919-0.
3
Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of risk.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2357-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2357.
4
Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):48-51. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573.
5
Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible?
Fertil Steril. 2000 Feb;73(2):292-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00510-5.
7
The prevalence of menopausal symptoms in patients treated for breast cancer.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1994;6(5):297-9. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80270-5.
8
Can a clinical trial be the treatment of choice for patients with cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Aug 17;80(12):886-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.12.886.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验