Suppr超能文献

关于禁止吸烟场所的民众态度变化:加利福尼亚州与美国其他地区的对比

Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA.

作者信息

Gilpin E A, Lee L, Pierce J P

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0645, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004739.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decade long California Tobacco Control Program is unique to the nation in its duration, emphasis, and level of funding. Programme emphasis is on changing social norms about smoking as a means to discourage smoking and thus reduce the harmful health effects of tobacco to the population.

METHODS

Data from the 1992-93, 1995-96, and 1998-99 Tobacco Use Supplements to the national Current Population Survey (n > 175 000 each period) were used to examine changes in norms regarding where smoking should "not be allowed at all" in both California and in the rest of the USA. Venues queried were restaurants, hospitals, work areas, bars, indoor sports venues, and indoor shopping malls.

RESULTS

There were substantial increases in the percentages of the adult population (18+ years) stating that smoking should not be allowed in the venues queried in California by 1998-99 compared to 1992-93; only modest increases were observed in the rest of the USA. In fact, for most venues, the percentages for the rest of the USA were lower in 1998-99 than in California in 1992-93. Further, the percentage increase over this period in respondents stating that smoking should not be allowed in four or more of the six venues was 30% in California and 23% in the rest of the USA. The most dramatic percentage increase in California occurred among current smokers (93%).

CONCLUSIONS

A strong, comprehensive tobacco control programme such as California's can influence population norms, including those of smokers, with respect to where smoking should not be allowed.

摘要

背景

长达十年的加利福尼亚州烟草控制项目在持续时间、重点和资金水平方面在全国独具特色。该项目的重点是改变关于吸烟的社会规范,以此作为劝阻吸烟的手段,从而减少烟草对民众健康的有害影响。

方法

利用1992 - 93年、1995 - 96年和1998 - 99年全国当前人口调查的烟草使用补充数据(每个时期n > 175000),来研究加利福尼亚州和美国其他地区在“完全不允许吸烟”场所规范方面的变化。所询问的场所包括餐馆、医院、工作区、酒吧、室内运动场馆和室内购物中心。

结果

与1992 - 93年相比,到1998 - 99年,加利福尼亚州表示在所询问场所不应允许吸烟的成年人口(18岁及以上)百分比大幅增加;而美国其他地区仅出现适度增长。事实上,对于大多数场所,1998 - 99年美国其他地区的百分比低于1992 - 93年加利福尼亚州的水平。此外,在此期间,表示在六个场所中的四个或更多场所不应允许吸烟的受访者百分比在加利福尼亚州增加了30%,在美国其他地区增加了23%。加利福尼亚州增幅最大的是当前吸烟者(93%)。

结论

像加利福尼亚州那样强有力的、全面的烟草控制项目能够影响民众规范,包括吸烟者对于不应允许吸烟场所的规范。

相似文献

2
Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme.
Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):207-12. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.010116.
3
Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking?
JAMA. 1998 Sep 9;280(10):893-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.10.893.
8
Tobacco control in California compared with the rest of the USA: trends in adult per capita cigarette consumption.
Tob Control. 2018 Oct;27(e2):e112-e117. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053895. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Analysis of responses of Long Beach, California residents to the Smoke-free Bars Law.
Public Health. 2005 Dec;119(12):1116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
10
California as a model.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):69S-73S.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco harm perceptions, regulatory attitudes, and cessation intentions before and after the COVID-19 lockdown in California.
Health Psychol Open. 2024 Dec 2;11:20551029241306095. doi: 10.1177/20551029241306095. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Effects of smoke-free government policy in Qingdao, China: Evidence from the path analysis.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289658. eCollection 2023.
3
The Role of Ethnicity and Nativity in the Correspondence between Subjective and Objective Measures of In-Home Smoking.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Oct;24(5):1214-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01307-3. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
4
Effects of State Preemption of Local Smoke-Free Restrictions on US Adult Cigarette Smoking Prevalence, 1997 to 2017.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2591-2593. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07115-7. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Estimating the impact of state cigarette tax rates on smoking behavior: Addressing endogeneity using a natural experiment.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108807. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108807. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Oct 9;13:1179173X20959700. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20959700. eCollection 2020.
8
Cohort effects of tobacco control policy: evidence to support a tobacco-free norm through smoke-free policy.
Tob Control. 2020 Jan;29(1):96-102. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054536. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Clean indoor air: advances in California, 1990-1999.
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):785-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.785.
3
Long-term effectiveness of mass media led antismoking campaigns in Australia.
Am J Public Health. 1990 May;80(5):565-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.5.565.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验