Birks Yvonne F, Porthouse Jill, Addie Caroline, Loughney Karen, Saxon Lucy, Baverstock Mike, Francis Roger M, Reid David M, Watt Ian, Torgerson David J
Primary Care Hip Protector Trial Group, York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, York University, Area 4, Seebhom Rowntree Building, YO10 5DD, UK.
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Sep;15(9):701-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1599-0. Epub 2004 Mar 3.
To assess whether hip protectors used among women living in the community in the United Kingdom and at high risk of hip fracture, lead to a reduction in hip fracture.
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Primary care with participants being recruited largely from general practitioners' patient lists.
Women aged 70 years and over with one or more risk factors for hip fracture (i.e., low body weight, current smoker, a prior fracture, family history of hip fracture).
Three pairs of hip protectors of the "shell" type mailed to participants with instructions on how to use them.
Reduction in hip fractures.
1,388 and 2,781 women aged 70 years or over were randomized to be given three pairs of hip protectors or act as controls, respectively. We followed up both groups of women for a minimum of 24 months (maximum 42 months, median 28). Compliance was poor with only 31% of participants reporting that they wore the hip protectors on a daily basis at 12 months. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of sustaining a hip fracture between the groups (OR = 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.78, p = 0.40). Adjustment for important covariates did not materially change these findings (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.75). Comparing the rate of hip fracture between those women who regularly wore the devices and the control group yielded an OR of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.58 to 2.03; p = 0.83).
This study is the largest RCT of hip protectors to date and provides no evidence of an effect of hip protectors among women living independently and at high risk of fracture.
评估在英国社区生活且髋部骨折风险高的女性中使用髋部保护器是否能降低髋部骨折发生率。
实用随机对照试验(RCT)。
主要从全科医生的患者名单中招募参与者进行初级保健。
70岁及以上且有一个或多个髋部骨折风险因素(即体重低、当前吸烟者、既往骨折、髋部骨折家族史)的女性。
给参与者邮寄三双“壳”型髋部保护器,并附上使用说明。
髋部骨折发生率的降低情况。
1388名和2781名70岁及以上的女性分别被随机分配接受三双髋部保护器或作为对照组。我们对两组女性进行了至少24个月(最长42个月,中位数28个月)的随访。依从性较差,只有31%的参与者报告在12个月时每天佩戴髋部保护器。意向性分析表明,两组之间发生髋部骨折的未调整优势比(OR)无统计学显著差异(OR = 1.19;95%置信区间,0.80至1.78,p = 0.40)。对重要协变量进行调整并未实质性改变这些结果(OR = 1.17;95% CI,0.78至1.75)。比较定期佩戴该装置的女性与对照组之间的髋部骨折发生率,得出OR为1.12(95% CI,0.58至2.03;p = 0.83)。
本研究是迄今为止关于髋部保护器的最大规模RCT,未提供证据表明髋部保护器对独立生活且骨折风险高的女性有效果。