Suppr超能文献

对犯罪者的审判会再次伤害犯罪受害者吗?

Do trials of perpetrators retraumatize crime victims?

作者信息

Orth Ulrich, Maercker Andreas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2004 Feb;19(2):212-27. doi: 10.1177/0886260503260326.

Abstract

Attendance at trials of perpetrators could be retraumatizing for crime victims suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder. To investigate this hypothesis, two studies were conducted in which retraumatization was defined as a significant increase in posttraumatic stress reactions. A cross-sectional study of 137 victims of rape and nonsexual assault revealed that trial variables do virtually not predict posttraumatic stress reactionsat a time several years after trial. A longitudinal study of 31 victims of rape and nonsexual assault revealed intraindividual stability of posttraumatic stress reactions for the time interval from a few weeks before the trial to a few weeks after the trial; in addition, interindividual stability was high. The results of both studies do not support the retraumatization hypothesis, which should therefore be used with caution.

摘要

让遭受创伤后应激障碍的犯罪受害者出席对犯罪者的审判可能会再次造成创伤。为了研究这一假设,开展了两项研究,其中再次造成创伤被定义为创伤后应激反应显著增加。一项对137名强奸和非性侵犯受害者的横断面研究表明,审判变量实际上并不能预测审判几年后的创伤后应激反应。一项对31名强奸和非性侵犯受害者的纵向研究表明,从审判前几周至审判后几周的时间间隔内,个体内部的创伤后应激反应具有稳定性;此外,个体间的稳定性也很高。两项研究的结果均不支持再次造成创伤的假设,因此应谨慎使用该假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验