Dworkin Emily R, Menon Suvarna V, Bystrynski Jonathan, Allen Nicole E
University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:65-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
Sexual assault (SA) is a common and deleterious form of trauma. Over 40years of research on its impact has suggested that SA has particularly severe effects on a variety of forms of psychopathology, and has highlighted unique aspects of SA as a form of trauma that contribute to these outcomes. The goal of this meta-analytic review was to synthesize the empirical literature from 1970 to 2014 (reflecting 497 effect sizes) to understand the degree to which (a) SA confers general risk for psychological dysfunction rather than specific risk for posttraumatic stress, and (b) differences in studies and samples account for variation in observed effects. Results indicate that people who have been sexually assaulted report significantly worse psychopathology than unassaulted comparisons (average Hedges' g=0.61). SA was associated with increased risk for all forms of psychopathology assessed, and relatively stronger associations were observed for posttraumatic stress and suicidality. Effects endured across differences in sample demographics. The use of broader SA operationalizations (e.g., including incapacitated, coerced, or nonpenetrative SA) was not associated with differences in effects, although including attempted SA in operationalizations resulted in lower effects. Larger effects were observed in samples with more assaults involving stranger perpetrators, weapons, or physical injury. In the context of the broader literature, our findings provide evidence that experiencing SA is major risk factor for multiple forms of psychological dysfunction across populations and assault types.
性侵犯(SA)是一种常见且有害的创伤形式。四十多年来对其影响的研究表明,性侵犯对多种精神病理学形式具有特别严重的影响,并突出了性侵犯作为一种创伤形式的独特方面,这些方面导致了这些结果。这项荟萃分析综述的目的是综合1970年至2014年的实证文献(反映497个效应量),以了解(a)性侵犯带来心理功能障碍的一般风险而非创伤后应激的特定风险的程度,以及(b)研究和样本的差异如何解释观察到的效应的变化。结果表明,遭受性侵犯的人报告的精神病理学状况明显比未受侵犯的对照组更差(平均Hedges' g = 0.61)。性侵犯与所评估的所有形式的精神病理学风险增加相关,并且观察到创伤后应激和自杀倾向的关联相对更强。效应在样本人口统计学差异中持续存在。使用更广泛的性侵犯操作定义(例如,包括无行为能力、被迫或非插入式性侵犯)与效应差异无关,尽管在操作定义中包括未遂性侵犯会导致效应较低。在涉及陌生人犯罪者、武器或身体伤害的更多性侵犯样本中观察到更大的效应。在更广泛的文献背景下,我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明经历性侵犯是不同人群和性侵犯类型中多种形式心理功能障碍的主要风险因素。