Suppr超能文献

我坐在这里,感觉自己像患了失语症!一项关于在未受损的说话者中引发的反复持续性错误的研究。

I'm sitting here feeling aphasic! A study of recurrent perseverative errors elicited in unimpaired speakers.

作者信息

Moses Melanie S, Nickels Lyndsey A, Sheard Christine

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):157-73. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00364-X.

Abstract

In this study, the recurrent perseverative errors produced by 44 speakers without impairment were examined in picture naming and reading aloud tasks under a fast response deadline. The proportion of perseverative relative to non-perseverative errors was greater in picture naming, the more error-prone task, than in reading aloud. Additionally, although perseverative errors were less likely to be related to the target than non-perseverative errors, the overall distribution of perseverative and non-perseverative errors in each task was similar. It is concluded that the perseverative errors produced by the participants reflected both the degree and level at which language processing efficiency was reduced in each task. This is consistent with a more recent account of perseveration as a result of normally existing persistent activation overcoming weakened activation of a target at any level of language processing. These results are compared with recent studies of recurrent perseverative errors produced by people with aphasia in light of the cognitive neuropsychological assumption that speakers with and without impairment utilise a common language processing system.

摘要

在本研究中,对44名无语言障碍的说话者在快速反应期限下的图片命名和大声朗读任务中产生的重复性持续性错误进行了检查。在更易出错的图片命名任务中,持续性错误相对于非持续性错误的比例高于大声朗读任务。此外,虽然持续性错误比非持续性错误与目标的关联性更小,但每个任务中持续性错误和非持续性错误的总体分布相似。研究得出结论,参与者产生的持续性错误反映了每个任务中语言处理效率降低的程度和水平。这与最近将持续性错误解释为在语言处理的任何层面上,正常存在的持续性激活克服目标的弱化激活的结果的观点一致。根据有语言障碍和无语言障碍的说话者使用共同语言处理系统这一认知神经心理学假设,将这些结果与近期关于失语症患者产生的重复性持续性错误的研究进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验