Brown P J, Christmas B F, Ford R P
Department of Paediatrics, Christchurch Hospital.
N Z Med J. 1992 Aug 12;105(939):309-11.
to examine the validity of routine use of axillary thermometers to measure body temperature in infants.
comparison of 49 simultaneous paired axillary and rectal temperature recordings in infants between one and 11 months of age, who were considered afebrile by their clinicians. Regression analysis of the paired measurements, and a plot of the differences between the paired measurements against their means, were used to examine the limits of agreement of the two methods.
the limits of agreement ranged from 0.2 to 1.6 degrees C difference between simultaneous paired measurements. As there was no consistent relationship between axillary and rectal temperatures, the use of a correction factor added to axillary values is invalid. The axillary thermometer may record almost the same as the rectal temperature or more than 1.5 degrees C lower at the same point in time.
we question the validity of current clinical practice in assessing infant body temperature by using axillary thermometers, and we suggest that such measurement does not reflect the rectal temperature in a reliable or consistent fashion. If infant body temperature is sought, a rectal thermometer should be used.
检验常规使用腋温计测量婴儿体温的有效性。
对49例年龄在1至11个月之间、临床医生认为无发热的婴儿同时进行腋温和直肠温度记录配对。采用配对测量的回归分析以及配对测量差值相对于其均值的绘图,来检验两种方法的一致性界限。
同时配对测量的一致性界限为相差0.2至1.6摄氏度。由于腋温和直肠温度之间没有一致的关系,给腋温值加上校正因子的做法是无效的。腋温计在同一时间点可能记录的温度与直肠温度几乎相同,或者比直肠温度低超过1.5摄氏度。
我们质疑当前临床实践中使用腋温计评估婴儿体温的有效性,并且我们认为这种测量不能以可靠或一致的方式反映直肠温度。如果要测量婴儿体温,应使用直肠温度计。