Suppr超能文献

德国和法国的非典型瘙痒病病例是通过疯牛病快速检测中不一致的反应模式来识别的。

Atypical scrapie cases in Germany and France are identified by discrepant reaction patterns in BSE rapid tests.

作者信息

Buschmann A, Biacabe A-G, Ziegler U, Bencsik A, Madec J-Y, Erhardt G, Lühken G, Baron T, Groschup M H

机构信息

Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Boddenblick 5a, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2004 Apr;117(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.11.017.

Abstract

The intensified surveillance of scrapie in small ruminants in the European Union (EU) has resulted in a substantial increase of the number of diagnosed cases. Four rapid tests which have passed the EU evaluation for BSE testing of cattle are also recommended currently and used for the testing of small ruminants by the EU authorities. These tests include an indirect ELISA (cELISA), a colorimetric sandwich ELISA (sELISA I), a chemiluminescent sandwich ELISA (sELISA II), and a Western blot (WB). To this point, the majority of samples have been screened by using either sELISA I (predominantly in Germany) or WB (predominantly in France). In this study, it is shown that a number of the German and French scrapie cases show inconsistent results using rapid and confirmatory test methods. Forty-eight German sheep, 209 French sheep and 19 French goat transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) cases were tested. All cases were recognised by the sELISA I and either one of the confirmatory methods (scrapie-associated fibrils (SAF)-immunoblot or immunohistochemistry). Surprisingly, three rapid tests failed to detect a significant number of scrapie cases (29 in France and 24 in Germany). The possible reasons for these inconsistent reaction patterns of scrapie cases are discussed. Similar discrepancies have not been observed during rapid testing of cattle for BSE, the disease for which all diagnostic methods applied have been evaluated.

摘要

欧盟对小型反刍动物痒病的强化监测导致确诊病例数量大幅增加。目前还推荐了四项已通过欧盟牛海绵状脑病检测评估的快速检测方法,并由欧盟当局用于小型反刍动物的检测。这些检测方法包括间接酶联免疫吸附测定法(cELISA)、比色夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法(sELISA I)、化学发光夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法(sELISA II)和蛋白质印迹法(WB)。至此,大多数样本是通过使用sELISA I(主要在德国)或WB(主要在法国)进行筛查的。在本研究中,结果表明,许多德国和法国的痒病病例使用快速检测和确证检测方法时结果不一致。对48只德国绵羊、209只法国绵羊和19例法国山羊传染性海绵状脑病(TSE)病例进行了检测。所有病例均通过sELISA I和一种确证方法(痒病相关纤维(SAF)免疫印迹或免疫组织化学)得以识别。令人惊讶的是,三项快速检测未能检测出大量的痒病病例(法国有29例,德国有24例)。本文讨论了这些痒病病例反应模式不一致的可能原因。在对牛进行疯牛病快速检测期间未观察到类似差异,所有应用的诊断方法均已针对疯牛病进行了评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验