Rubaj Andrzej, Rucinski Piotr, Kutarski Andrzej, Dabrowska-Kugacka Alicja, Oleszczak Krzysztof, Zimon Barbara, Trojnar Michal, Zapolski Tomasz, Drozd Jakub, Tarkowski Adam, Wysokinski Andrzej
Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 8 Jaczewskiego Str, Lublin, Poland.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;37(2):147-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9792-8. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
Interatrial block (IAB) frequently coexists with sinus node disease and is considered a risk factor of left atrial dysfunction, atrial arrhythmias, and heart failure development. Conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing impairs intra- and interatrial conductions and consequently prolongs P wave duration. Biatrial (BiA) pacing helps correct IAB, but its advantageous influence remains controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of BiA and RAA pacing on cardiac hemodynamics and serum concentrations of inflammatory markers and neuropeptides.
Twenty-eight patients with IAB and preserved atrio-ventricular conduction treated with BiA pacing were studied. Standard invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed during BiA and RAA pacings. Furthermore, the influence of 1 week of BiA and RAA pacing on neuropeptides: atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and markers of inflammation: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and neopterin was examined.
BiA pacing resulted in significant increase of cardiac output (CO) and reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. We demonstrated significantly lower concentrations of ANP, hs-CRP, IL-6, and neopterin after 1 week of BiA in comparison to RAA pacing. BNP levels remained unchanged.
BiA pacing in comparison to RAA pacing improves hemodynamic performance in patients with IAB and preserved atrio-ventricular conduction. BiA pacing is associated with reduction of ANP and markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, and neopterin).
房间阻滞(IAB)常与窦房结疾病并存,被认为是左心房功能障碍、房性心律失常和心力衰竭发生的危险因素。传统的右心耳(RAA)起搏会损害心房内和心房间传导,从而延长P波时限。双心房(BiA)起搏有助于纠正IAB,但其有益影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较BiA和RAA起搏对心脏血流动力学以及炎症标志物和神经肽血清浓度的影响。
对28例接受BiA起搏治疗且房室传导正常的IAB患者进行研究。在BiA和RAA起搏期间进行标准的有创血流动力学测量。此外,还研究了1周的BiA和RAA起搏对神经肽:心房利钠肽(ANP)和脑利钠肽(BNP)以及炎症标志物:高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)和蝶呤的影响。
BiA起搏使心输出量(CO)显著增加,肺毛细血管楔压降低。我们发现,与RAA起搏相比,BiA起搏1周后ANP、hs-CRP、IL-6和蝶呤的浓度显著降低。BNP水平保持不变。
与RAA起搏相比,BiA起搏可改善IAB且房室传导正常患者的血流动力学表现。BiA起搏与ANP以及炎症标志物(hs-CRP、IL-6和蝶呤)的降低有关。