• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阶梯式螺旋种植体四种螺纹形态的有限元分析

Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant.

作者信息

Geng J P, Ma Q S, Xu W, Tan K B C, Liu G R

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Huayu Hospital, Shaoxing, China.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Mar;31(3):233-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x
PMID:15025655
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal thread form configuration for an experimental stepped screw implant. Two-dimensional finite element analysis was applied to model the experimental stepped screw implant in a standard cross-section of the posterior human mandible digitized from a CT-generated patient data set. Four different thread form configurations: v-thread (V), thin-thread (T), and two square-thread forms of 0.24 mm (S1) and 0.36 mm (S2) thread width were compared under oblique load in normal cortical bone condition. The support-type constraint position changed from middle to the base of the bone segment. In middle support-type constraint position only the thin-thread (T) model demonstrated significantly different stress distribution from the other three models, however, in base support-type constraint position T and S1 models demonstrated significantly different stress distribution from the other two models. The results implies that v-thread (V) or large square-thread (S2) are optimal thread form for the experimental stepped screw implant. While, minimal support constraints allow clearer differentiation of the stress picture between the different stepped screw types at the trabecular bone-implant interface.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定一种实验性阶梯式螺钉种植体的最佳螺纹形态结构。应用二维有限元分析,在从CT生成的患者数据集中数字化的人类下颌骨后部标准横截面中对实验性阶梯式螺钉种植体进行建模。比较了四种不同的螺纹形态结构:V形螺纹(V)、细螺纹(T)以及两种螺纹宽度分别为0.24 mm(S1)和0.36 mm(S2)的方形螺纹,在正常皮质骨条件下承受斜向载荷。支撑型约束位置从骨段中部移至基部。在中部支撑型约束位置,仅细螺纹(T)模型的应力分布与其他三种模型有显著差异,然而,在基部支撑型约束位置,T和S1模型的应力分布与其他两种模型有显著差异。结果表明,V形螺纹(V)或大方形螺纹(S2)是实验性阶梯式螺钉种植体的最佳螺纹形态。同时,最小支撑约束能更清晰地区分不同阶梯式螺钉类型在小梁骨 - 种植体界面处的应力情况。

相似文献

1
Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant.阶梯式螺旋种植体四种螺纹形态的有限元分析
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Mar;31(3):233-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x.
2
Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.牙科种植体的种植体主体设计与螺纹设计比较:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):551-62.
3
Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.圆柱种植体螺纹高度和宽度的评估:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):65-74.
4
Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.骨结合式阶梯状螺纹牙种植体的有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2004;30(4):223-33. doi: 10.1563/0654.1.
5
Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.使用有限元分析评估骨结合牙种植体参数——一项二维比较研究,考察种植体直径、种植体形状和载荷方向的影响。
J Oral Implantol. 1998;24(2):80-8. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2.
6
Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.使用三维有限元分析研究薄羟基磷灰石涂层对牙种植体周围骨组织应力/应变分布的影响。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16(3):157-69.
7
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.不同骨质量对种植支持式冠应力分布影响的三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019.
8
Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同直径即刻负重种植体的种植体-骨界面应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;18(5):393-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00453.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
9
The dynamic natures of implant loading.种植体加载的动态特性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):359-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60079-2.
10
Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体设计与骨质量对种植体周围骨组织应力/应变分布的影响:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):357-68.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different complex macro designs in commercially available implants: An in-vitro study.市售种植体不同复杂宏观设计应力分布的三维有限元分析:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):761-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Biomechanical comparison of the undercut thread design conventional buttress thread for the lag screw of the dynamic hip screw system.动力髋螺钉系统拉力螺钉的倒钩螺纹设计与传统支撑螺纹的生物力学比较。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 28;10:1019172. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1019172. eCollection 2022.
3
Fixation stability comparison of bone screws based on thread design: buttress thread, triangle thread, and square thread.
基于螺纹设计的骨螺钉固定稳定性比较:支撑螺纹、三角螺纹和方螺纹。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 30;23(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05751-6.
4
A 3-D finite element analysis of the effect of dental implant thread angle on stress distribution in the surrounding bone.牙种植体螺纹角度对周围骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Winter;16(1):53-61. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.009. Epub 2022 May 29.
5
Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.超短种植体周围微运动及种植体周围应力与应变分析——三维有限元法研究
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):288-294. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_350_20. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Can barb thread design improve the pullout strength of bone screws?倒刺螺纹设计能否提高接骨螺钉的拔出强度?
Bone Joint Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):105-112. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0072.R2.
7
An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone.两种不同设计的种植体在极软骨质中适合即刻负重的初期稳定性值的体外评估
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Jan 8;9(1):5. doi: 10.3390/dj9010005.
8
Crestal module design optimization of dental implants: finite element analysis and in vivo studies.牙种植体的牙冠模块设计优化:有限元分析和体内研究。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Jul 25;30(8):90. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6291-1.
9
A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of varying implant crest module designs on the stress distribution to the bone.不同种植体颈部模块设计对骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 May-Jun;16(3):145-152.
10
A Prosthetic Solution to Poorly Placed Implants in the Posterior Mandible.下颌后牙区种植体位置不佳的修复解决方案。
Case Rep Dent. 2018 Nov 25;2018:1327230. doi: 10.1155/2018/1327230. eCollection 2018.