Triulzi D J, Vanek K, Ryan D H, Blumberg N
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
Transfusion. 1992 Jul-Aug;32(6):517-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32692367194.x.
Allogeneic blood transfusion has been implicated as an independent risk factor for postoperative bacterial infection in clinical and animal studies. The association among transfusion, quantitative immunologic factors, and infection was examined in 102 patients undergoing 109 spinal fusion procedures. In 60 procedures, patients received autologous blood only; in 24 procedures, they received at least 1 unit of allogeneic blood, and in 25 procedures, they received no transfusions. Twenty-two patients developed bacterial infections, in 8 cases while in hospital and in 14 cases after discharge. Univariate analysis revealed that patients who received any allogeneic blood and those who received no allogeneic blood differed significantly in the rate of hospital-acquired infection (20.8 vs. 3.5%), length of stay (12.3 vs. 9.7 days), days of fever greater than or equal to 38 degrees C (4.0 vs. 2.9), days on antibiotics (3.9 vs. 2.5), duration of surgery (309 vs. 231 min), blood loss (1343 vs. 887 mL), surgeon, and postoperative drop in natural killer (NK) cells (-174 vs. -42/microL). Multivariate logistic and linear regressions revealed that the number of allogeneic units transfused was the only significant predictor of in-hospital infection (p = 0.016) or days on antibiotics and length of stay. None of the clinical, surgical, or transfusion variables was significantly associated with posthospital infection, although a significantly greater drop in NK cells had occurred in patients who developed infection (p = 0.0035). These data strongly implicate allogeneic transfusion as a risk factor for in-hospital postoperative bacterial infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在临床和动物研究中,异体输血已被视为术后细菌感染的独立危险因素。对102例接受109次脊柱融合手术的患者,研究了输血、定量免疫因素与感染之间的关联。60例手术患者仅接受自体血;24例手术患者至少接受1单位异体血;25例手术患者未接受输血。22例患者发生细菌感染,8例在住院期间感染,14例在出院后感染。单因素分析显示,接受任何异体血的患者与未接受异体血的患者在医院获得性感染率(20.8%对3.5%)、住院时间(12.3天对9.7天)、体温≥38℃的天数(4.0天对2.9天)、使用抗生素天数(3.9天对2.5天)、手术时长(309分钟对231分钟)、失血量(1343毫升对887毫升)、外科医生以及术后自然杀伤(NK)细胞减少量(-174对-42/微升)方面存在显著差异。多因素逻辑回归和线性回归显示,输注异体血的单位数是医院内感染(p = 0.016)、使用抗生素天数和住院时间的唯一显著预测因素。尽管发生感染的患者NK细胞减少量显著更大(p = 0.0035),但临床、手术或输血变量均与出院后感染无显著关联。这些数据有力地表明异体输血是术后医院内细菌感染的危险因素。(摘要截断于250字)