Suppr超能文献

患有痴呆症和未患痴呆症患者中的谵妄:根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)做出的诊断与先前的分类有何不同?

Delirium among patients with and without dementia: does the diagnosis according to the DSM-IV differ from the previous classifications?

作者信息

Laurila Jouko V, Pitkala Kaisu H, Strandberg Timo E, Tilvis Reijo S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Geriatric Clinic, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;19(3):271-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1079.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different diagnostic criteria differ in their capacity to identify subjects as delirious. It is not known how DSM-IV classification, compared with the DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10, identifies delirium among individuals with and without dementia and whether the symptom profiles differ between these two subgroups.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed on patients (age > or = 70 years) in seven acute geriatric wards (n = 230) and in seven nursing-homes (n = 195) in Helsinki, Finland. Delirium was diagnosed according to the operationalized criteria according to the DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and clinical criteria of ICD-10. Dementia was defined according to consensus judgment among three geriatricians with concise information including: prior dementia diagnoses, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, operationalized criteria according to the DSM-IV, nurses and/or caregivers interviews, and the results of the brain CT/MRI and prior Mini-Mental State Examination scores, when available.

RESULTS

According to the DSM-III, DSM-IIIR, DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria of delirium 22.7, 23.5, 25.9 and 14.9% of the demented, and 12.9, 13.5, 23.5 and 2.9% of the non-demented, respectively, were diagnosed as delirious. In stepwise logistic regression analysis clouding of consciousness, perceptual disturbances, and disorganized thinking were the most significant contributors to delirium diagnosis according to the DSM-IV among individuals with dementia, whereas perceptual disturbances, motor disturbances, and disorientation were the most significant contributors among those without dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

DSM-IV criteria of delirium identify new, often non-demented, subjects as being delirious, while ICD-10 is overly restrictive. The symptom profile of delirium was slightly different among individuals with and without dementia.

摘要

背景

不同的诊断标准在识别谵妄患者的能力上存在差异。与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)、第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)相比,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)如何在患有和未患有痴呆症的个体中识别谵妄,以及这两个亚组之间的症状特征是否不同,目前尚不清楚。

方法

对芬兰赫尔辛基7个急性老年病房(n = 230)和7个养老院(n = 195)中年龄≥70岁的患者进行了一项横断面研究。根据DSM-III、DSM-III-R、DSM-IV的操作性标准以及ICD-10的临床标准诊断谵妄。痴呆症根据三位老年病专家的共识判断来定义,简要信息包括:既往痴呆症诊断、临床痴呆评定量表、根据DSM-IV的操作性标准、护士和/或护理人员访谈,以及脑CT/MRI结果和既往简易精神状态检查得分(如有)。

结果

根据DSM-III、DSM-IIIR、DSM-IV和ICD-10的谵妄标准,分别有22.7%、23.5%、25.9%和14.9%的痴呆患者,以及12.9%、13.5%、23.5%和2.9%的非痴呆患者被诊断为谵妄。在逐步逻辑回归分析中,意识模糊、感知障碍和思维紊乱是DSM-IV诊断痴呆患者谵妄的最重要因素,而感知障碍、运动障碍和定向障碍是诊断非痴呆患者谵妄的最重要因素。

结论

DSM-IV的谵妄标准将新的、通常是非痴呆的个体识别为谵妄患者,而ICD-10则过于严格。患有和未患有痴呆症的个体之间谵妄的症状特征略有不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验