Stürmer Stefan, Simon Bernd
Institut für Psychologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;30(3):263-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256690.
The authors conducted a panel study with two points of measurement throughout a 12-month interval in the context of the German gay movement to test the predictive power of collective identification in subsequent actual social movement participation. Regression analyses including cross-lagged panel analyses clearly confirmed the hypothesized unique predictive value of identification with a formal social movement organization above and beyond the role the collective, normative, and reward motives traditionally considered in social movement research. Of the three motives, the normative motive was particularly predictive. Moreover, data from an additional telephone follow-up (3 years after the initial measurement) suggests that when the conflict with political opponents becomes particularly fierce, identification with the broader recruitment category, which was previously ineffective as a unique predictor, can politicize to such an extent that it also becomes a strong predictor of participation.
作者在德国同性恋运动的背景下进行了一项小组研究,在12个月的时间间隔内进行了两次测量,以检验集体认同在随后实际社会运动参与中的预测力。回归分析,包括交叉滞后小组分析,明确证实了与正式社会运动组织的认同具有假设的独特预测价值,这超出了社会运动研究中传统考虑的集体、规范和奖励动机的作用。在这三种动机中,规范动机的预测性尤为突出。此外,额外电话随访(首次测量后3年)的数据表明,当与政治对手的冲突变得尤为激烈时,与更广泛招募类别(此前作为独特预测指标无效)的认同会在很大程度上政治化,从而也成为参与的有力预测指标。