Hornsey Matthew J, Imani Armin
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;30(3):365-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261295.
Research on group criticism has demonstrated that criticisms are received less defensively when made by an ingroup member than when made by an outsider (the intergroup sensitivity effect). Three experiments tested the extent to which this effect is driven by social identity concerns or by judgments of how experienced the source of the criticism is. In Experiments 1 and 2, Australians who criticized Australia (ingroup critics) were met with less defensiveness than were foreigners who criticized Australia (outgroup critics), regardless of the amount of experience the foreigner had with Australia. Furthermore, the effects of speaker type on evaluations were mediated by perceptions of the extent to which the criticisms were intended to be constructive but not by perceptions of experience. Finally, Experiment 3 indicated that although experience does not help outgroup critics, a lack of experience can hurt ingroup critics. Recommendations are provided as to how people can reduce defensiveness when making group criticisms.
关于群体批评的研究表明,与由外部成员提出批评相比,由群体内部成员提出批评时,人们接受批评时的防御性更低(群体间敏感效应)。三项实验测试了这种效应在多大程度上是由社会身份担忧驱动的,或者是由对批评来源经验的判断驱动的。在实验1和实验2中,批评澳大利亚的澳大利亚人(群体内部批评者)比批评澳大利亚的外国人(群体外部批评者)遭遇的防御性更低,无论外国人对澳大利亚的了解程度如何。此外,发言者类型对评价的影响是通过对批评旨在具有建设性的程度的认知来介导的,而不是通过对经验的认知来介导的。最后,实验3表明,虽然经验对群体外部批评者没有帮助,但缺乏经验会损害群体内部批评者。针对人们在进行群体批评时如何降低防御性提供了建议。