Novakofski J
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2004 Mar;82(3):905-15. doi: 10.2527/2004.823905x.
The use of experimental models is the foundation of experimental biology, so it is important to know how much the models can tell us about actual animals. Inconsistent or contradictory results from in vitro models are often associated with the perception that a particular model or results are somehow wrong and therefore cannot tell us anything important about how an animal works. In fact, in vitro conditions do not create new biology. Differences between in vitro and in vivo behavior can only result from the actual cellular repertoire, which provides a powerful tool to uncover new information. Adipose tissue research provides a useful context for examining this issue because the regulation of adipose growth and metabolism has important economic implications for livestock production. Examples are discussed in which either excess skepticism or narrow interpretation of results slowed progress toward our current understanding of adipose biology. Similarly, contemporary examples using genomics are used to suggest that large inconsistencies are still apparent with in vitro methods. Careful consideration of these inconsistencies may provide new insights.
实验模型的使用是实验生物学的基础,因此了解这些模型能在多大程度上向我们揭示实际动物的情况非常重要。体外模型得出的不一致或相互矛盾的结果,常常让人觉得某个特定模型或结果在某种程度上是错误的,因而无法告诉我们关于动物如何运作的任何重要信息。事实上,体外条件并不会创造新的生物学现象。体外和体内行为的差异只能源于实际的细胞组成,而这为揭示新信息提供了一个强大的工具。脂肪组织研究为审视这个问题提供了一个有用的背景,因为脂肪生长和代谢的调节对畜牧生产具有重要的经济意义。文中讨论了一些例子,其中过度怀疑或对结果的狭隘解读减缓了我们目前对脂肪生物学理解的进展。同样,当代使用基因组学的例子表明,体外方法仍然存在明显的巨大不一致性。仔细考虑这些不一致性可能会提供新的见解。