Archer Bridie J, Johnson Stuart K, Devereux Helen M, Baxter Amynta L
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Br J Nutr. 2004 Apr;91(4):591-9. doi: 10.1079/BJN20031088.
The present study examined whether replacing fat with inulin or lupin-kernel fibre influenced palatability, perceptions of satiety, and food intake in thirty-three healthy men (mean age 52 years, BMI 27.4 kg/m(2)), using a within-subject design. On separate occasions, after fasting overnight, the participants consumed a breakfast consisting primarily of either a full-fat sausage patty (FFP) or a reduced-fat patty containing inulin (INP) or lupin-kernel fibre (LKP). Breakfast variants were alike in mass, protein and carbohydrate content; however the INP and LKP breakfasts were 36 and 37 % lower in fat and 15 and 17 % lower in energy density respectively compared with the FFP breakfast. The participants rated their satiety before breakfast then evaluated patty acceptability. Satiety was rated immediately after consuming the breakfast, then over the subsequent 4.5 h whilst fasting. Food consumed until the end of the following day was recorded. All patties were rated above 'neither acceptable or unacceptable', however the INP rated lower for general acceptability (P=0.039) and the LKP lower for flavour (P=0.023) than the FFP. The LKP breakfast rated more satiating than the INP (P=0.010) and FFP (P=0.016) breakfasts. Total fat intake was 18 g lower on the day of the INP (P=0.035) and 26 g lower on the day of the LKP breakfast (P=0.013) than the FFP breakfast day. Energy intake was lower (1521 kJ) only on the day of the INP breakfast (P=0.039). Both inulin and lupin-kernel fibre appear to have potential as fat replacers in meat products and for reducing fat and energy intake in men.
本研究采用受试者内设计,探究了用菊粉或羽扇豆仁纤维替代脂肪是否会影响33名健康男性(平均年龄52岁,体重指数27.4kg/m²)的适口性、饱腹感及食物摄入量。在不同时间,参与者隔夜禁食后食用主要由全脂香肠肉饼(FFP)、含菊粉的低脂肉饼(INP)或羽扇豆仁纤维的低脂肉饼(LKP)组成的早餐。早餐变体在质量、蛋白质和碳水化合物含量上相似;然而,与FFP早餐相比,INP和LKP早餐的脂肪含量分别低36%和37%,能量密度分别低15%和17%。参与者在早餐前对饱腹感进行评分,然后评估肉饼的可接受性。食用早餐后立即对饱腹感进行评分,随后在禁食的4.5小时内持续评分。记录直至次日结束所摄入的食物。所有肉饼的评分均高于“既不可接受也不可不接受”,然而,与FFP相比,INP的总体可接受性评分较低(P = 0.039),LKP的风味评分较低(P = 0.023)。LKP早餐的饱腹感评分高于INP(P = 0.010)和FFP(P = 0.016)早餐。与FFP早餐日相比,INP早餐日的总脂肪摄入量低18克(P = 0.035),LKP早餐日的总脂肪摄入量低26克(P = 0.013)。仅在INP早餐日能量摄入量较低(1521千焦)(P =