Jones Roger A C
Department of Agriculture, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA, Australia.
Virus Res. 2004 Mar;100(1):5-30. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.011.
Virus diseases cause serious losses in yield and quality of cultivated plants worldwide. These losses and the resulting financial damage can be limited by controlling epidemics using measures that minimise virus infection sources or suppress virus spread. For each combination of virus, cultivated plant and production system, there is an 'economic threshold' above which the financial damage is sufficient to justify using such measures. However, individual measures used alone may bring only small benefits and they may become ineffective, especially over the long term. When diverse control measures that act in different ways are combined and used together, their effects are complementary resulting in far more effective overall control. Such experiences have led to the development of integrated management concepts for virus diseases that combine available host resistance, cultural, chemical and biological control measures. Selecting the ideal mix of measures for each pathosystem and production situation requires detailed knowledge of the epidemiology of the causal virus and the mode of action of each individual control measure so that diverse responses can be devised to meet the unique features of each of the different scenarios considered. The strategies developed must be robust and necessitate minimal extra expense, labour demands and disruption to standard practices. Examples of how epidemiological information can be used to develop effective integrated disease management (IDM) strategies for diverse situations are described. They involve circumstances where virus transmission from plant-to-plant occurs in four different ways: by contact, non-persistently or persistently by insect vectors, and by root-infecting fungi. The examples are: Subterranean clover mottle virus (SCMoV) (contact-transmitted) and Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) (non-persistently aphid-transmitted) in annually self-regenerating clover pasture; three seed-borne viruses (all non-persistently aphid-transmitted) plots of pasture legume improvement programmes; Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) (persistently thrips-transmitted) in vegetables in seedling nurseries, protected cropping or field systems; and lettuce big-vein disease (fungus-transmitted) in lettuce in seedling nursery, hydroponic, infested field or uninfested field situations. By describing the kinds of approaches required, this article is intended to help future research and extension programmes devise integrated disease management strategies that not only function effectively to diminish the losses caused by economically important plant virus diseases but also fulfill the requirement of being environmentally and socially responsible.
病毒病在全球范围内导致栽培植物的产量和品质遭受严重损失。通过采取措施减少病毒感染源或抑制病毒传播来控制疫情,可以限制这些损失以及由此造成的经济损害。对于病毒、栽培植物和生产系统的每一种组合,都存在一个“经济阈值”,超过该阈值,经济损害就足以证明采取此类措施是合理的。然而,单独使用的个别措施可能只会带来微小的益处,而且可能会失效,尤其是从长期来看。当将以不同方式起作用的多种控制措施组合并一起使用时,它们的效果是互补的,从而实现更有效的总体控制。这些经验促使人们开发出病毒病综合管理理念,将可用的寄主抗性、栽培、化学和生物控制措施结合起来。为每个病原系统和生产情况选择理想的措施组合,需要详细了解致病病毒的流行病学以及每种控制措施的作用方式,以便能够设计出多样化的应对措施,以适应所考虑的每个不同场景的独特特征。所制定的策略必须稳健,所需的额外费用、劳动力需求和对标准做法的干扰要最小。本文描述了如何利用流行病学信息为不同情况制定有效的综合病害管理(IDM)策略。这些情况涉及病毒在植物间以四种不同方式传播的情形:通过接触传播、由昆虫介体非持久性或持久性传播,以及由根部感染真菌传播。具体例子包括:在每年自生的三叶草牧场中的地下三叶草斑驳病毒(SCMoV)(接触传播)和菜豆黄花叶病毒(BYMV)(由蚜虫非持久性传播);牧场豆科植物改良计划地块中的三种种传病毒(均由蚜虫非持久性传播);在苗圃、保护地栽培或田间系统的蔬菜中的番茄斑萎病毒(TSWV)(由蓟马持久性传播);以及在苗圃、水培、感染地块或未感染地块的生菜中的生菜大脉病(由真菌传播)。通过描述所需的方法类型,本文旨在帮助未来的研究和推广计划制定综合病害管理策略,这些策略不仅能有效减少由具有经济重要性的植物病毒病造成的损失,还能满足对环境和社会负责的要求。