Ernst Edzard
Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Feb 28;116(4):128-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03040749.
The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and critically evaluate all randomised clinical trials testing the effectiveness of the whole system of anthroposophical medicine either as a sole or as an adjunctive form of treatment. Seven independent literature searches were conducted to locate all such studies. Trials of single remedies within the wider anthroposophical approach were excluded. No language restrictions were applied. Unfortunately not a single study was located which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. It was therefore concluded that, at present, the question whether the anthroposophical concept of healing generates more good than harm cannot be answered.
本系统评价的目的是总结并批判性评估所有测试人智医学整个体系作为单一治疗形式或辅助治疗形式有效性的随机临床试验。进行了七次独立的文献检索以查找所有此类研究。更广泛的人智医学方法中单一疗法的试验被排除在外。未设语言限制。遗憾的是,未找到一项符合纳入/排除标准的研究。因此得出结论,目前,人智医学治疗理念是利大于弊还是弊大于利的问题无法得到解答。