Suppr超能文献

两家医院全身麻醉下儿童牙科护理及牙科疾病水平分析。

Analysis of paediatric dental care provided under general anaesthesia and levels of dental disease in two hospitals.

作者信息

Camilleri A, Roberts G, Ashley P, Scheer B

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, The Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, UK.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2004 Feb 28;196(4):219-23; discussion 213. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810988.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the level of dental disease and the pattern of dental treatment under controlled airway general anaesthesia for ASA I and II children and ASA III and IV children in two hospitals.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis.

SETTING

Hospital and postgraduate dental teaching institution, UK 1996 - 2000.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

During a four-year period (1996-2000), data were collected on children aged 1 to 16 years who were admitted for treatment of dental caries under general anaesthesia. Outcome measures Levels of dental disease (dmft/DMFT), treatment provided.

RESULTS

A total of 515 ASA I and II and 430 ASA III and IV children were treated. The dmft and DMFT values of the ASA I and II children were significantly higher than those of the ASA III and IV children (p = 0.03). A significantly greater number of restorations and fissure sealants were carried out for permanent teeth in ASA III and IV children (p < 0.001). The number of extractions for both primary and permanent teeth was significantly greater in the ASA I and II group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ASA III and IV children had significantly lower levels of dental caries than the ASA I and II children and received a higher level of preventive and restorative care.

摘要

目的

比较两家医院中,在控制性气道全身麻醉下,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的儿童与ASA分级为III级和IV级的儿童的牙科疾病水平及牙科治疗模式。

设计

前瞻性分析。

地点

英国的医院及研究生牙科教学机构,1996 - 2000年。

研究对象与方法

在四年期间(1996 - 2000年),收集了1至16岁因龋齿接受全身麻醉治疗的儿童的数据。观察指标:牙科疾病水平(乳牙龋失补牙面数/恒牙龋失补牙面数)、所提供的治疗。

结果

共治疗了515例ASA I级和II级儿童以及430例ASA III级和IV级儿童。ASA I级和II级儿童的乳牙龋失补牙面数和恒牙龋失补牙面数显著高于ASA III级和IV级儿童(p = 0.03)。ASA III级和IV级儿童恒牙的修复和窝沟封闭治疗数量显著更多(p < 0.001)。ASA I级和II级组的乳牙和恒牙拔除数量均显著更多(p < 0.05)。

结论

ASA III级和IV级儿童的龋齿水平显著低于ASA I级和II级儿童,且接受了更高水平的预防性和修复性治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验