Crowe David A, Chafee Matthew V, Averbeck Bruno B, Georgopoulos Apostolos P
Brain Sciences Center (11B), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, One Veterans Drive, MN 55417, Minneapolis, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Sep;158(1):28-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1876-3. Epub 2004 Mar 20.
Traditionally, primary motor cortex (M1) has been thought to be involved solely in planning and generating movements. Recent evidence suggests that the arm area of M1 plays a role in other functions, such as the representation of serial order (Pellizzer et al. 1995, Science 269:702-705; Carpenter et al. 1999, Science 283:1752-1757) and spatial processing (Georgopoulos et al. 1989, Science 243:234-236). Previous studies of such cognitive processes have used tasks in which a directed arm movement was required, raising a question as to whether this brain area is involved in cognitive processing per se, or whether such cognitive signals may be gated into the arm area of M1 only when arm movements are required. To study this question, we developed a task that required a spatial analysis of a complex visual stimulus, but required no arm movement as a response. In this task, monkeys were shown an octagonal maze. After an imposed delay of 2 to 2.5 s, they indicated whether a path that emanated from the center of the maze exited at the perimeter (exit maze) or terminated within the maze (no-exit maze) by pressing a pedal with their left or right foot, respectively. We recorded from 785 cells from the arm area of M1 from two monkeys during the delay period of the maze task. We found that cell activity was influenced by both the exit status and the direction of the path, beginning soon after the maze was displayed. This activity was not related to the activation of arm muscles, suggesting that the directional signals observed represented abstract spatial aspects of maze processing. Finally, we compared maze-related activity of M1 neurons with those recorded from posterior parietal area 7a, reported previously (Crowe et al. 2004). Interestingly, cells from each area exhibited similar properties. Both the exit status and path direction were encoded by cells in M1 and 7a, although to different extents. An analysis of the time-course of the neural representation of these factors revealed that area 7a and M1 begin to encode these factors at the same time, suggesting these brain areas are part of a distributed system performing the spatial computations involved in maze solution.
传统上,人们认为初级运动皮层(M1)仅参与运动的计划和产生。最近的证据表明,M1的臂区在其他功能中也发挥作用,比如序列顺序的表征(佩利泽等人,1995年,《科学》269卷:702 - 705页;卡彭特等人,1999年,《科学》283卷:1752 - 1757页)以及空间处理(乔治opoulos等人,1989年,《科学》243卷:234 - 236页)。此前关于此类认知过程的研究使用的任务都需要有指向性的手臂运动,这就引发了一个问题:这个脑区是本身就参与认知处理,还是只有在需要手臂运动时,此类认知信号才会传入M1的臂区。为了研究这个问题,我们设计了一个任务,该任务需要对复杂视觉刺激进行空间分析,但不需要以手臂运动作为反应。在这个任务中,给猴子展示一个八角形迷宫。在施加了2到2.5秒的延迟后,它们分别用左脚或右脚踩踏板来表明从迷宫中心发出的一条路径是在迷宫周边出口(出口迷宫)还是在迷宫内部终止(无出口迷宫)。在迷宫任务的延迟期,我们从两只猴子的M1臂区记录了785个细胞的活动。我们发现,在迷宫展示后不久,细胞活动就受到出口状态和路径方向的影响。这种活动与手臂肌肉的激活无关,这表明观察到的方向信号代表了迷宫处理的抽象空间方面。最后,我们将M1神经元的迷宫相关活动与先前报道的后顶叶7a区记录的活动进行了比较(克罗等人,2004年)。有趣的是,每个区域的细胞都表现出相似的特性。出口状态和路径方向在M1和7a区的细胞中都有编码,尽管程度不同。对这些因素的神经表征的时间进程分析表明,7a区和M1区同时开始对这些因素进行编码,这表明这些脑区是执行迷宫求解中涉及的空间计算的分布式系统的一部分。