Patel J V, Masonis J L, Guerin J, Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H
Division of Orthopaedics, London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Mar;86(2):195-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13564.
We report the five- to-ten year results of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type-2 bone defects treated with modular metal augments in revision knee surgery. A total of 102 revision knee arthroplasties in patients with type-2 defects treated with augments and stems were prospectively studied. Seven patients (seven knees) had incomplete follow-up and 15 patients (16 knees) died with the arthroplasty in situ. The mean follow-up of the 79 remaining knees was 7 +/- 2 years (5 to 11). The presence of non-progressive radiolucent lines around the augment in 14% of knees was not associated with poorer knee scores, the range of movement, survival of the component or the type of insert which was used (p > 0.05). The survival of the components was 92 +/- 0.03% at 11 years (95% CI, 10.3 to 11.2). We recommend the use of modular augmentation devices to treat type-2 defects in revision knee surgery.
我们报告了在膝关节翻修手术中使用模块化金属增强物治疗安德森骨科研究所2型骨缺损的5至10年结果。对总共102例接受增强物和柄治疗的2型缺损患者的膝关节翻修术进行了前瞻性研究。7例患者(7个膝关节)随访不完整,15例患者(16个膝关节)在关节成形术原位时死亡。其余79个膝关节的平均随访时间为7±2年(5至11年)。14%的膝关节增强物周围出现非进行性透光线,这与膝关节评分较差、活动范围、组件生存率或所使用的插入物类型无关(p>0.05)。组件在11年时的生存率为92±0.03%(95%CI,10.3至11.2)。我们建议在膝关节翻修手术中使用模块化增强装置来治疗2型缺损。