Suppr超能文献

订书机与环扎线:从医院支付方角度的成本分析。

Staplers vs. loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3419-3424. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06639-0. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Presently, there is equipoise regarding the surgical technique used to manage the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this research was to determine whether the routine use of loop ligature, compared to stapling, is cost effective from a hospital payer perspective.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis at two major academic hospitals. In order to eliminate possible systematic bias arising from one technique being preferentially employed with more complex presentations, patients were divided into study groups based on the technique routinely employed by their surgeon, loop ligature (LLA) versus stapler (LSA). Pediatric patients and open appendectomies were excluded. Costs were determined using a previously published model derived from publicly available data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, in conjunction with local cost data for disposable procurement. Secondary outcomes included operating room time, length of stay, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Between Jan 1, 2014 and Dec 31, 2015, 567 adult patients had an emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. In comparing surgeons who routinely employed LLA to LSA, there was a significant decrease in total mean hospital cost with LLA ($1988 ± $143 vs. $2253 ± $99, p = 0.002). In addition, mean disposable cost was reduced for surgeons using LLA ($310 ± $27 vs. $668 ± $26, p < 0.001). This reduction in cost was not associated with a difference in length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.28) or complication rates (8% vs. 10%, p = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that surgeons who routinely use loop ligature to secure the appendiceal base during emergency laparoscopic appendectomy offer more cost-effective care compared to stapler users, saving their institution more than $200 per case with no clear disadvantages. A shift from routine use of staplers to loop ligature should result in significant overall cost savings to the hospital.

摘要

背景

目前,在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中处理阑尾残端的手术技术方面存在平衡。本研究的目的是从医院支付者的角度确定与使用吻合器相比,常规使用环形结扎是否具有成本效益。

方法

对两家主要学术医院因急性阑尾炎行急诊腹腔镜手术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。为了消除由于一种技术优先用于更复杂的表现而产生的可能系统性偏差,根据其外科医生常规使用的技术(环扎术,LLA 与吻合器,LSA)将患者分为研究组。排除儿科患者和开放性阑尾切除术。使用先前发表的来自安大略病例成本倡议的公开数据和当地耗材采购成本的模型来确定成本。次要结果包括手术室时间、住院时间和并发症发生率。

结果

2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,567 例成人因急性阑尾炎行急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较常规使用 LLA 的外科医生与常规使用 LSA 的外科医生,LLA 组的总平均医院费用显著降低(1988±143 美元比 2253±99 美元,p=0.002)。此外,使用 LLA 的外科医生的平均耗材成本降低(310±27 美元比 668±26 美元,p<0.001)。这种成本的降低与住院时间(1.5 天比 1.4 天,p=0.28)或并发症发生率(8%比 10%,p=0.43)无差异相关。

结论

这些发现表明,与使用吻合器的外科医生相比,在急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术中常规使用环形结扎术来固定阑尾残端的外科医生提供了更具成本效益的护理,每个病例可为其机构节省 200 多美元,而且没有明显的劣势。从常规使用吻合器转为常规使用环形结扎术应能使医院总体成本显著节省。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验