Suppr超能文献

测量侧化偏好与精神分裂症:爱丁堡高危研究的结果及方法学问题

Measurement of lateral preferences and schizophrenia: results of the Edinburgh High-Risk Study and methodological issues.

作者信息

Byrne Majella, Clafferty Robert A, Cosway Richard, Grant Elizabeth, Hodges Ann, Lawrie Stephen M, Johnstone Eve C

机构信息

National Centre for Register Based Research, University of Aarhus, Taasingegade 1, 8000-C, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2004 Mar 15;125(3):205-17. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.01.001.

Abstract

The assessment and measurement of handedness has varied across studies, limiting the comparability of results. Data from the Edinburgh High Risk for Schizophrenia Study were analyzed to investigate the effect of different methods of assessment and scoring of hand preferences on the prevalence of handedness type and on between-group differences in handedness. Handedness was measured using both the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and the Annett Handedness Scale in 143 subjects at high risk for schizophrenia, 31 control subjects, and 27 patients with a first episode of schizophrenia. Hand preferences were identified through demonstration of items and by verbal report. No group differences were found, although the prevalence of hand preferences changed substantially depending on the definition used. Significant correlations with socio-demographic factors were found in some instances, but these correlations depended on the definition of handedness. No sex differences were identified. The magnitude of group differences remained similar, although the prevalence of handedness types varied greatly with changes in definition of handedness. Care should be taken in correlation studies to avoid spurious relationships between handedness and other factors. To allow for comparability of results across studies, researchers should adopt a standard definition of handedness.

摘要

不同研究中对利手的评估和测量方法各异,这限制了研究结果的可比性。对爱丁堡精神分裂症高危研究的数据进行了分析,以探究不同的利手评估和计分方法对利手类型患病率以及组间利手差异的影响。在143名精神分裂症高危受试者、31名对照受试者和27名首次发作的精神分裂症患者中,使用爱丁堡利手量表和安妮特利手量表对利手进行了测量。通过展示物品和口头报告来确定利手偏好。尽管根据所使用的定义,利手偏好的患病率有很大变化,但未发现组间差异。在某些情况下发现了与社会人口学因素的显著相关性,但这些相关性取决于利手的定义。未发现性别差异。尽管利手类型的患病率随利手定义的变化而有很大差异,但组间差异的大小仍然相似。在相关性研究中应注意避免利手与其他因素之间的虚假关系。为了使不同研究的结果具有可比性,研究人员应采用利手的标准定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验