van Mil J W Foppe, Westerlund L O Tommy, Hersberger Kurt E, Schaefer Marion A
van Mil Consultancy, Zuidlaren, The Netherlands.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 May;38(5):859-67. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D182. Epub 2004 Mar 30.
To provide an overview of and critically appraise classifications of drug-related problems (DRPs) for use during the pharmaceutical care process and research in pharmacy.
A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Yahoo (January 2003) and manually. The search terms included DRP, drug-related problem, drug-therapy problem, and medicine-related problem.
English- and German-language articles on pharmaceutical care and DRPs were reviewed.
Most classifications of DRPs were identified through searching publications on pharmaceutical care and DRPs. Fourteen classifications with different focuses were found. Some classifications were hierarchical, categorized into main groups and subgroups. Various terminologies and definitions for DRPs were revealed, as well as guidelines for an optimal DRP classification. Classifications were assessed according to a clear definition, published validation method, and results reflecting process and outcomes, usability in pharmaceutical care practice, and a hierarchical structure with main groups and subgroups.
Finding DRP classifications by computerized search of the biomedical literature with the help of PubMed proved to be difficult. No classification could be found that met all of our criteria for an optimal system. Few classifications have been validated. Three have been tested as to their usability in practice and internal consistency. The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe system Version 4 comes closest to the defined requirements.
概述并批判性评价药物相关问题(DRP)的分类,以便在药学服务过程及药学研究中使用。
使用MEDLINE和雅虎(2003年1月)进行文献检索,并进行手工检索。检索词包括DRP、药物相关问题、药物治疗问题和药品相关问题。
对有关药学服务和DRP的英文和德文文章进行了综述。
大多数DRP分类是通过检索有关药学服务和DRP的出版物确定的。发现了14种重点不同的分类。一些分类是分层的,分为主要组和子组。揭示了DRP的各种术语和定义,以及最佳DRP分类的指南。根据明确定义、已发表的验证方法、反映过程和结果的结果、在药学服务实践中的可用性以及具有主要组和子组的分层结构对分类进行了评估。
事实证明,借助PubMed通过计算机检索生物医学文献来查找DRP分类很困难。未找到符合我们对最佳系统所有标准的分类。很少有分类经过验证。有三种分类在实践中的可用性和内部一致性方面经过了测试。欧洲药学服务网络系统第4版最接近规定要求。