Meeuwissen Marjolein, Roelofs Ardi, Levelt Willem J M
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1238-48. doi: 10.3758/bf03195807.
On the basis of evidence from studies of the naming and reading of numerals, Ferrand (1999) argued that the naming of objects is slower than reading their names, due to a greater response uncertainty in naming than in reading, rather than to an obligatory conceptual preparation for naming, but not for reading. We manipulated the need for conceptual preparation, while keeping response uncertainty constant in the naming and reading of complex numerals. In Experiment 1, participants named three-digit Arabic numerals either as house numbers or clock times. House number naming latencies were determined mostly by morphophonological factors, such as morpheme frequency and the number of phonemes, whereas clock time naming latencies revealed an additional conceptual involvement. In Experiment 2, the numerals were presented in alphabetic format and had to be read aloud. Reading latencies were determined mostly by morphophonological factors in both modes. These results suggest that conceptual preparation, rather than response uncertainty, is responsible for the difference between naming and reading latencies.
基于有关数字命名和阅读研究的证据,费朗(1999年)认为,物体的命名比读出其名称要慢,这是因为命名时的反应不确定性比阅读时更大,而不是因为命名需要强制性的概念准备,而阅读则不需要。我们在保持复杂数字命名和阅读中反应不确定性不变的同时,操纵了概念准备的需求。在实验1中,参与者将三位阿拉伯数字命名为门牌号或时钟时间。门牌号命名潜伏期主要由形态音位因素决定,如语素频率和音素数量,而时钟时间命名潜伏期则显示出额外的概念参与。在实验2中,数字以字母形式呈现,必须大声读出。两种模式下的阅读潜伏期主要由形态音位因素决定。这些结果表明,造成命名和阅读潜伏期差异的原因是概念准备,而非反应不确定性。