Suppr超能文献

在使用含有2-(2-丁氧基乙氧基)乙醇的产品进行灌装、加料和涂刷过程中的皮肤接触。

Dermal exposure during filling, loading and brushing with products containing 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol.

作者信息

Gijsbers José H J, Tielemans Erik, Brouwer Derk H, van Hemmen Joop J

机构信息

TNO Chemistry, Department of Chemical Exposure Assessment, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Apr;48(3):219-27. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh008. Epub 2004 Mar 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Limited quantitative information is available on dermal exposure to chemicals during various industrial activities. Therefore, within the scope of the EU-funded RISKOFDERM project, potential dermal exposure was measured during three different tasks: filling, loading and brushing. DEGBE (2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol) was used as a 'marker' substance to determine dermal exposure to the products that workers were handling.

METHODS

Potential whole body exposure was measured using self-constructed cotton sampling pads on 11 body locations. Cotton gloves were used to determine the contamination of both hands. Bulk samples were collected to determine the concentration of DEGBE so as to be able to calculate exposure to the handled product.

RESULTS

A total of 94 task-based measurements were performed, 30 on filling, 28 on loading and 36 on brushing, which resulted in potential dermal hand exposure to the handled product of 4.1-18 269 mg [geometric mean (GM) 555.4, n = 30], 0.3-27745 mg (GM 217.0, n = 28) and 11.3-733.3 mg (GM 98.4, n = 24) for each of the scenarios, respectively. Potential whole body exposure to the product during filling and loading ranged from 1.67 to 155.0 (GM 15.2, n = 9) and <LOD to 176.2 (GM 0.30, n = 10). Because of sampling and analytical problems, whole body exposure during brushing could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

Dermal exposure during filling and loading were of the same order of magnitude, while brushing resulted in much lower exposure levels, probably due to differences in work activities and work precision. For each of the scenarios, contamination was mainly found on the hands, representing up to 96% of the total exposure for filling. For filling and loading the most important source of variability in exposure was due to between-company variability rather than to either between-worker or within-worker variability. The pooled between-worker variability was the most important source of variability in dermal exposure levels for the brushing scenario.

摘要

引言

关于在各种工业活动中皮肤接触化学物质的定量信息有限。因此,在欧盟资助的“RISKOFDERM”项目范围内,在三项不同任务(灌装、装载和涂刷)期间测量了潜在的皮肤接触情况。使用二乙二醇丁醚(2-(2-丁氧基乙氧基)乙醇)作为“标记”物质来确定工人接触产品时的皮肤接触情况。

方法

使用自制的棉质采样垫在11个身体部位测量潜在的全身接触情况。使用棉手套来确定双手的污染情况。采集大量样本以确定二乙二醇丁醚的浓度,从而能够计算接触所处理产品的量。

结果

总共进行了94次基于任务的测量,其中30次是灌装测量,28次是装载测量,36次是涂刷测量,每种情况导致接触所处理产品的潜在手部皮肤接触量分别为4.1 - 18269毫克[几何均值(GM)555.4,n = 30]、0.3 - 27745毫克(GM 217.0,n = 28)和11.3 - 733.3毫克(GM 98.4,n = 24)。灌装和装载期间产品的潜在全身接触量范围为1.67至155.0(GM 15.2,n = 9)和低于检测限至176.2(GM 0.30,n = 10)。由于采样和分析问题,无法确定涂刷期间的全身接触情况。

结论

灌装和装载期间的皮肤接触量处于同一数量级,而涂刷导致的接触水平要低得多,这可能是由于工作活动和工作精度的差异。对于每种情况,污染主要出现在手部,在灌装时占总接触量的比例高达96%。对于灌装和装载,接触量变化的最重要来源是公司间的差异,而不是工人间或工人内部的差异。对于涂刷情况,合并的工人间差异是皮肤接触水平变化的最重要来源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验