Davidson Philip W, Myers Gary J, Weiss Bernard
Strong Center for Developmental Disabilities, Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4 Suppl):1023-9.
Mercury is ubiquitous in the global environment, ensuring universal exposure. Some forms of mercury are especially neurotoxic, including clinical signs at high doses. However, typical human exposures occur at low to moderate doses. Only limited data about neurotoxicity at low doses are available, and scientists differ in their interpretation. Dose-response data on neurodevelopment are particularly limited. Despite or perhaps because of the lack of sufficient or consistent scientific data, public concern about a link between mercury exposure and developmental disabilities has been rising. After reviewing the data, the US Environmental Protection Agency proposed a reference dose (an estimate of a daily dose that is likely to be without a risk of adverse effects over a lifetime) for methyl mercury that is substantially lower than previous guidelines from the World Health Organization, the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and the US Food and Drug Administration. Some questions have been raised about the Environmental Protection Agency's guidelines, but the issue remains unresolved. Meanwhile, consumer groups have raised questions about the potential link between mercury exposure and autism spectrum disorders as well as other adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This hypothesis has prompted some parents to seek regulatory, legal, or medical remedies in the absence of firm evidence. This article reviews what is known about mercury neurotoxicity and neurodevelopmental risk. Our intent is to focus the debate about mercury on 1) additional research that should be sought and 2) defining the principal issues that public policy makers face.
汞在全球环境中无处不在,这使得所有人都暴露于汞的影响之下。某些汞的形态具有很强的神经毒性,在高剂量时会引发临床症状。然而,人类通常处于低至中等剂量的汞暴露环境中。目前关于低剂量汞神经毒性的数据有限,科学家们对此的解读也存在分歧。关于神经发育方面的剂量反应数据尤其匮乏。尽管缺乏足够或一致的科学数据,或者也许正因如此,公众对汞暴露与发育障碍之间联系的担忧日益增加。在审查相关数据后,美国环境保护局针对甲基汞提出了一个参考剂量(即对一生中每日可能无不良影响风险的剂量估计),该剂量远低于世界卫生组织、美国有毒物质和疾病登记署以及美国食品药品监督管理局先前的指导标准。对于美国环境保护局的指导标准,人们提出了一些疑问,但该问题仍未得到解决。与此同时,消费者团体也对汞暴露与自闭症谱系障碍以及其他不良神经发育结果之间的潜在联系提出了质疑。这一假设促使一些家长在缺乏确凿证据的情况下寻求监管、法律或医疗方面的补救措施。本文回顾了关于汞神经毒性和神经发育风险的已知情况。我们的目的是将关于汞的争论聚焦于:1)应开展的更多研究;2)明确公共政策制定者面临的主要问题。