Hamilton-Miller J M
Department of Medical Microbiology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Feb;29(2):141-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/29.2.141.
The in-vitro activities of the 14-membered macrolides erythromycin, dirithromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, the 15-membered compound azithromycin and the 16-membered macrolides (16 MM) josamycin, spiramycin and midecamycin acetate (MOM) have been compared against staphylococci, enterococci and streptococci. Results have been analysed separately according to the sensitivity status of the tested strains to erythromycin, namely sensitive (S), inducibly resistant (IR) or constitutively resistant (CR). 14- and 15-membered macrolides were active only against S strains; the order of potency in vitro was clarithromycin = erythromycin greater than azithromycin = roxithromycin greater than dirithromycin. The 16 MM were slightly less active against S strains than were the 14- and 15-membered compounds, and inhibited most IR strains; MOM and josamycin were about twice as potent as spiramycin. IR and S Staphylococcus aureus strains were equally sensitive to 16 MM, while IR strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were less sensitive than were S strains. All CR strains of S. aureus were resistant to 16 MM, as were most of the other CR strains. However, 5/21 CR coagulase-negative staphylococci and 2/20 CR enterococci tested were sensitive to 16 MM. The seven CR strains showing anomalous sensitivity to the 16 MM (five Staphylococcus haemolyticus and two enterococci) were only 'moderately resistant' to erythromycin (MIC 8-64 mg/L), while all the other CR strains were 'highly resistant' (MIC greater than 128 mg/L). These results indicate that it may be difficult to predict the sensitivity of Gram-positive cocci to 16 MM, and therefore individual sensitivity testing to specific compounds is essential.
已比较了14元大环内酯类药物红霉素、地红霉素、罗红霉素、克拉霉素、15元化合物阿奇霉素以及16元大环内酯类药物(16MM)交沙霉素、螺旋霉素和麦迪霉素醋酸酯(MOM)对葡萄球菌、肠球菌和链球菌的体外活性。根据受试菌株对红霉素的敏感状态,即敏感(S)、诱导性耐药(IR)或固有耐药(CR),分别对结果进行了分析。14元和15元大环内酯类药物仅对S菌株有活性;体外效力顺序为克拉霉素 = 红霉素 > 阿奇霉素 = 罗红霉素 > 地红霉素。16MM对S菌株的活性略低于14元和15元化合物,并能抑制大多数IR菌株;MOM和交沙霉素的效力约为螺旋霉素的两倍。IR和S金黄色葡萄球菌菌株对16MM同样敏感,而凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的IR菌株比S菌株敏感性低。所有金黄色葡萄球菌的CR菌株对16MM耐药,其他大多数CR菌株也是如此。然而,所检测的21株CR凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中有5株和20株CR肠球菌中有2株对16MM敏感。对16MM表现出异常敏感性的7株CR菌株(5株溶血葡萄球菌和2株肠球菌)仅对红霉素“中度耐药”(MIC为8 - 64mg/L),而所有其他CR菌株均“高度耐药”(MIC大于128mg/L)。这些结果表明,可能难以预测革兰氏阳性球菌对16MM的敏感性,因此对特定化合物进行个体敏感性检测至关重要。