Brun Y, Coulet M, Forey F, Fleurette J
Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, Lyon.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1988 Jun;36(5 Pt 2):613-8.
This study aimed to compare the bacteriostatic activity of roxithromycin (RU) to those of erythromycin (ERY), troleandomycin (TAO), spiramycin (SPI), josamycin (JOS) and midekamycin (MID) against staphylococci strains. 239 strains of hospital origin were analysed: S. aureus (139), coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) (100). The MIC were determined by the agar dilution method. The modal MIC, the MIC 50 and 90 observed for the both groups of strains are given according to species and antibiotics. This study gives the opportunity to classify the 6 antibiotics in a decreasing order considering their antistaphylococcal activity: RU = ERY, TAO = SPI, JOS = MID. No difference was noticeable between S. aureus and CNS strains.
本研究旨在比较罗红霉素(RU)与红霉素(ERY)、醋竹桃霉素(TAO)、螺旋霉素(SPI)、交沙霉素(JOS)和麦迪霉素(MID)对葡萄球菌菌株的抑菌活性。分析了239株医院来源的菌株:金黄色葡萄球菌(139株)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)(100株)。采用琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。根据菌种和抗生素给出了两组菌株观察到的众数MIC、MIC50和MIC90。本研究有机会根据6种抗生素的抗葡萄球菌活性将它们按降序排列:RU = ERY,TAO = SPI,JOS = MID。金黄色葡萄球菌和CNS菌株之间没有明显差异。