Kraemer William J, Nindl Bradley C, Ratamess Nicholas A, Gotshalk Lincoln A, Volek Jeff S, Fleck Steven J, Newton Robert U, Häkkinen Keijo
Human Performance Laboratory Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):697-708. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000122734.25411.cf.
Adaptations of arm and thigh muscle hypertrophy to different long-term periodized resistance training programs and the influence of upper body resistance training were examined.
Eighty-five untrained women (mean age = 23.1 +/- 3.5 yr) started in one of the following groups: total-body training [TP, N = 18 (3-8 RM training range) and TH, N = 21 (8-12 RM training range)], upper-body training [UP, N = 21 (3-8 RM training range) and UH, N = 19, (8-12 RM training range)], or a control group (CON, N = 6). Training took place on three alternating days per week for 24 wk. Assessments of body composition, muscular performance, and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were determined pretraining (T1), and after 12 (T2) and 24 wk (T3) of training.
Arm CSA increased at T2 (approximately 11%) and T3 (approximately 6%) in all training groups and thigh CSA increased at T2 (approximately 3%) and T3 (approximately 4.5%) only in TP and TH. Squat one-repetition maximum (1 RM) increased at T2 (approximately 24%) and T3 (approximately 11.5%) only in TP and TH and all training groups increased 1 RM bench press at T2 (approximately 16.5%) and T3 (approximately 12.4%). Peak power produced during loaded jump squats increased from T1 to T3 only in TP (12%) and TH (7%). Peak power during the ballistic bench press increased at T2 only in TP and increased from T1 to T3 in all training groups.
Training specificity was supported (as sole upper-body training did not influence lower-body musculature) along with the inclusion of heavier loading ranges in a periodized resistance-training program. This may be advantageous in a total conditioning program directed at development of muscle tissue mass in young women.
研究手臂和大腿肌肉肥大对不同长期周期性抗阻训练计划的适应性以及上身抗阻训练的影响。
85名未经训练的女性(平均年龄=23.1±3.5岁)开始参与以下其中一组训练:全身训练[TP组,N=18(3-8RM训练范围)和TH组,N=21(8-12RM训练范围)],上身训练[UP组,N=21(3-8RM训练范围)和UH组,N=19(8-12RM训练范围)],或对照组(CON组,N=6)。训练每周进行三天,交替进行,共24周。在训练前(T1)、训练12周后(T2)和24周后(T3),通过磁共振成像(MRI)对身体成分、肌肉性能和肌肉横截面积(CSA)进行评估。
所有训练组的手臂CSA在T2时增加(约11%),在T3时增加(约6%);只有TP组和TH组的大腿CSA在T2时增加(约3%),在T3时增加(约4.5%)。只有TP组和TH组的深蹲一次最大重复量(1RM)在T2时增加(约24%),在T3时增加(约11.5%);所有训练组的卧推1RM在T2时增加(约16.5%),在T3时增加(约12.4%)。负重跳蹲过程中产生的峰值功率仅在TP组(12%)和TH组(7%)从T1增加到T3。弹道卧推过程中的峰值功率仅在TP组的T2时增加,在所有训练组中从T1增加到T3。
训练特异性得到了支持(因为单纯的上身训练不会影响下身肌肉组织),同时在周期性抗阻训练计划中纳入了更大的负荷范围。这在旨在发展年轻女性肌肉组织质量的全面训练计划中可能是有利的。