Marx J O, Ratamess N A, Nindl B C, Gotshalk L A, Volek J S, Dohi K, Bush J A, Gómez A L, Mazzetti S A, Fleck S J, Häkkinen K, Newton R U, Kraemer W J
The Human Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Apr;33(4):635-43. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200104000-00019.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the long-term training adaptations associated with low-volume circuit-type versus periodized high-volume resistance training programs in women.
34 healthy, untrained women were randomly placed into one of the following groups: low-volume, single-set circuit (SSC; N = 12); periodized high-volume multiple-set (MS; N = 12); or nonexercising control (CON) group (N = 10). The SSC group performed one set of 8-12 repetitions to muscular failure 3 d x wk(-1). The MS group performed two to four sets of 3-15 repetitions with periodized volume and intensity 4 d x wk(-1). Muscular strength, power, speed, endurance, anthropometry, and resting hormonal concentrations were determined pretraining (T1), after 12 wk (T2), and after 24 wk of training (T3).
1-RM bench press and leg press, and upper and lower body local muscular endurance increased significantly (P < or = 0.05) at T2 for both groups, but only MS showed a significant increase at T3. Muscular power and speed increased significantly at T2 and T3 only for MS. Increases in testosterone were observed for both groups at T2 but only MS showed a significant increase at T3. Cortisol decreased from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3 in MS. Insulin-like growth factor-1 increased significantly at T3 for SSC and at T2 and T3 for MS. No changes were observed for growth hormone in any of the training groups.
Significant improvements in muscular performance may be attained with either a low-volume single-set program or a high-volume, periodized multiple-set program during the first 12 wk of training in untrained women. However, dramatically different training adaptations are associated with specific domains of training program design which contrast in speed of movement, exercise choices and use of variation (periodization) in the intensity and volume of exercise.
本研究旨在确定低容量循环训练与周期性高容量阻力训练计划对女性长期训练适应的影响。
34名健康、未经训练的女性被随机分为以下几组:低容量单组循环训练组(SSC;N = 12);周期性高容量多组训练组(MS;N = 12);或非运动对照组(CON)(N = 10)。SSC组每周进行3天,每组8 - 12次重复至肌肉疲劳。MS组每周进行4天,每组进行2 - 4组,每组3 - 15次重复,训练量和强度呈周期性变化。在训练前(T1)、12周后(T2)和24周训练后(T3)测定肌肉力量、功率、速度、耐力、人体测量指标和静息激素浓度。
两组在T2时,1次最大重复卧推和腿举以及上、下肢局部肌肉耐力均显著增加(P≤0.05),但只有MS组在T3时显著增加。仅MS组在T2和T3时肌肉功率和速度显著增加。两组在T2时睾酮均升高,但只有MS组在T3时显著增加。MS组皮质醇从T1到T2以及从T2到T3均下降。SSC组在T3时胰岛素样生长因子 - 1显著增加,MS组在T2和T3时显著增加。所有训练组生长激素均无变化。
在未经训练的女性训练的前12周,低容量单组训练计划或高容量、周期性多组训练计划均可显著改善肌肉性能。然而,不同的训练适应与训练计划设计的特定领域相关,这些领域在运动速度、运动选择以及运动强度和量的变化(周期性)使用方面存在差异。