Szapocznik Jose, Feaster Daniel J, Mitrani Victoria B, Prado Guillermo, Smith Lila, Robinson-Batista Carleen, Schwartz Seth J, Mauer Magaly H, Robbins Michael S
Center for Family Studies, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Apr;72(2):288-303. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.288.
This study tests the efficacy of Structural Ecosystems Therapy (SET), a family-ecological intervention, in improving psychosocial functioning when compared with an attention-comparison person-centered condition and a community control condition. A sample of 209 HIV-seropositive, urban, low-income, African American women was randomized into 1 of the 3 conditions. Results of growth curve analyses over 5 time points revealed that SET was more efficacious than either of the control conditions in reducing psychological distress and family-related hassles. However, contrary to hypotheses, SET was not more efficacious in increasing family support. Latent growth mixture modeling analyses indicated that SET was most efficacious for women who, on average, were at or near the clinical threshold for psychological distress and for women with high levels of family hassles. Implications for further intervention development are discussed.
本研究测试了结构性生态系统疗法(SET)这一家庭生态干预措施,与注意力比较以人为中心的条件和社区对照条件相比,在改善心理社会功能方面的疗效。209名城市低收入非洲裔美国艾滋病毒血清阳性女性样本被随机分为三种条件中的一种。对5个时间点的生长曲线分析结果显示,在减轻心理困扰和家庭相关麻烦方面,SET比任何一种对照条件都更有效。然而,与假设相反,SET在增加家庭支持方面并不更有效。潜在生长混合模型分析表明,SET对平均处于或接近心理困扰临床阈值的女性以及家庭麻烦程度高的女性最有效。讨论了对进一步干预发展的启示。