Kalk Andreas, Fleischer Klaus
Bureau GTZ, B.P. 59, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lepr Rev. 2004 Mar;75(1):67-78.
Decentralization policies are an integrated component of health sector reform in an increasing number of countries. The ability of such policies to improve the health system's quality and efficiency is backed up by limited scientific evidence. This study intends to evaluate the impact of decentralization on a specialized field of disease control (leprosy control) in Colombia and Brazil. It analyses the respective juridical base, epidemiological indicators and local publications. Furthermore, 39 semi-structured interviews with key informants were conducted. In both countries, the devolution of technical responsibility and financial resources to the municipalities was the implemented form of decentralization. Access to preventive and curative health care and the community participation in decision-making improved clearly only in Brazil. The decentralization to private providers in Colombia had dubious effects on service quality in general and still more on public health. The flow of finances (including finance collection through state-owned taxes instead of insurance companies) seemed to be better controlled in Brazil. Leprosy control in Brazil took advantage of the decentralization process; in Colombia, it came close to a collapse.
在越来越多的国家,权力下放政策是卫生部门改革的一个组成部分。此类政策改善卫生系统质量和效率的能力得到的科学证据有限。本研究旨在评估权力下放在哥伦比亚和巴西疾病控制的一个专门领域(麻风病控制)中的影响。它分析了各自的法律基础、流行病学指标和当地出版物。此外,还对39名关键信息提供者进行了半结构化访谈。在这两个国家,将技术责任和财政资源下放给各市是权力下放的实施形式。只有在巴西,获得预防和治疗性医疗保健以及社区参与决策的情况才明显改善。哥伦比亚向私营提供者的权力下放总体上对服务质量产生了可疑影响,对公共卫生的影响更是如此。巴西的资金流动(包括通过国有税收而非保险公司征收资金)似乎得到了更好的控制。巴西的麻风病控制利用了权力下放进程;在哥伦比亚,它几乎陷入崩溃。