• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对手动轮椅使用者的功能评估方法的开发。

Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users.

作者信息

Stanley Rhonda K, Stafford Deborah J, Rasch Elizabeth, Rodgers Mary M

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902-0581, USA.

出版信息

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4):301-7. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0301.

DOI:10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0301
PMID:15074441
Abstract

This investigation developed the Wheelchair Users Functional Assessment (WUFA). Because no functional outcome tools exist that include many of the daily activities that are needed to be independent by individuals using manual wheelchairs, development of an appropriate tool was deemed important. Although the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) can be used to assess disability in those using a wheelchair, it only measures some aspects of basic activities of daily living (ADLs) and does not measure community independence. Therefore, both basic activities and community activities were included in the new tool. A panel of six rehabilitation experts, with input from manual wheelchair users, determined content of the instrument. The resulting WUFA scale includes 13 items. Interrater reliability and stability were established with the calculation of an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC for interrater reliability was 0.96 and ICC for stability was 0.78. Further analysis was performed on the internal consistency of the 13-item tool using a sample of 101 tested subjects. This analysis was done using a Cronbach's Alpha. Results indicated excellent internal consistency of the 13 items. The standardized coefficient alpha was 0.96. The WUFA was shown to have content validity, promising interrater reliability and stability, and good internal consistency. Further research is warranted to determine the tool's sensitivity and capability to discriminate between levels of functional independence.

摘要

本研究开发了轮椅使用者功能评估(WUFA)。由于不存在包含使用手动轮椅的个体实现独立所需的许多日常活动的功能结局工具,因此开发一种合适的工具被认为很重要。尽管功能独立性测量(FIM)可用于评估轮椅使用者的残疾情况,但它仅测量日常生活活动(ADL)的某些方面,而不测量社区独立性。因此,新工具既包括基本活动也包括社区活动。一个由六名康复专家组成的小组,在手动轮椅使用者的参与下,确定了该工具的内容。最终的WUFA量表包括13个项目。通过计算组内相关系数(ICC)确定了评分者间信度和稳定性。评分者间信度的ICC为0.96,稳定性的ICC为0.78。使用101名受试对象的样本对这个13项工具的内部一致性进行了进一步分析。该分析使用了克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's Alpha)。结果表明这13个项目具有出色的内部一致性。标准化系数阿尔法为0.96。WUFA被证明具有内容效度、良好的评分者间信度和稳定性以及良好的内部一致性。有必要进行进一步研究以确定该工具的敏感性以及区分功能独立性水平的能力。

相似文献

1
Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users.一种针对手动轮椅使用者的功能评估方法的开发。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4):301-7. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0301.
2
Test-retest reliability, internal item consistency, and concurrent validity of the wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool.轮椅座位不适评估工具的重测信度、内部项目一致性和同时效度。
Assist Technol. 2005 Fall;17(2):98-107. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2005.10132100.
3
Interrater and intrarater reliability of the wheelchair skills test version 4.2 for power wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能测试版本4.2的评分者间信度和评分者内信度
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Mar;40(6):678-683. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1271464. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form.轮椅使用信心量表:简版的意大利语翻译、改编及验证
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug;13(6):575-580. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1357053. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills.功能移动能力评估具有可靠性,并与满意度、独立性和技能相关。
Assist Technol. 2021 Sep 3;33(5):264-270. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1629125. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
From "wheelchair circuit" to "wheelchair assessment instrument for people with multiple sclerosis": reliability and validity analysis of a test to assess driving skills in manual wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis.从“轮椅回路”到“多发性硬化症患者轮椅评估工具”:评估多发性硬化症手动轮椅使用者驾驶技能的测试的可靠性和有效性分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.025. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
7
Telerehabilitation assessment using the Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair-Capacity instrument.使用“轮椅功能日常能力”工具进行远程康复评估。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(2):115-24. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.03.0039.
8
Measurement properties of the WheelCon for powered wheelchair users.适用于电动轮椅使用者的WheelCon测量属性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Oct;13(7):614-619. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1358301. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test in nonambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症非行走个体坐位测试功能的信度和效度
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Dec;39(4):308-312. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000188.
10
Reliability of the seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users.成人轮椅使用者坐姿姿势控制测量的可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Dec 30;27(24):1479-91. doi: 10.1080/09638280500276570.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中,将以患者为中心的结果指标与个人轮椅预算流程相结合使用:一种混合方法,用于探索使用WATCh和WATCh-Ad的工作人员和服务使用者的体验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0312967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312967. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.开发轮式移动指标以提高脊髓损伤康复质量:SCI-High项目。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):130-140. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647934.
3
Development of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire and initial face and content validity.
轮椅界面问卷的开发及初步的表面效度和内容效度。
Afr J Disabil. 2019 Mar 28;8:520. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.520. eCollection 2019.
4
Development of the Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children (WATCh): A patient-centred outcome measure for young wheelchair users.《轮椅儿童结局评估工具(WATCh)的制定:为年轻轮椅使用者制定的以患者为中心的结局测量工具》
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209380. eCollection 2018.
5
Discriminatory validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as demonstrated by a comparison of four wheelchair types designed for use in low-resource areas.通过对四种设计用于资源匮乏地区的轮椅类型进行比较,展示轮椅移动性测试各方面的区分效度。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:332. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.332. eCollection 2017.
6
Development of a wheelchair mobility skills test for children and adolescents: combining evidence with clinical expertise.儿童及青少年轮椅移动技能测试的开发:将证据与临床专业知识相结合。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0809-9.
7
Necessity to develop a tool to evaluate activity of daily living for electric powered indoor/outdoor chair users.有必要开发一种工具,用于评估电动室内/室外座椅使用者的日常生活活动能力。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Apr;39(2):277-84. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.277. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
8
Development and content validation of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: a mixed-methods study.轮椅使用信心量表的开发与内容效度验证:一项混合方法研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(1):57-66. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.512970.
9
Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review.轮椅特定活动与参与结果测量指标的选择问题:一项综述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.010.