Schein Richard M, Schmeler Mark R, Holm Margo B, Pramuka Michael, Saptono Andi, Brienza David M
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, 6425 Penn Avenue, Suite 401, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(2):115-24. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.03.0039.
This study explored the interrater reliability between a generalist practitioner administering the Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair-Capacity (FEW-C) in person (IP) and a remote expert practitioner observing via telerehabilitation (TR) from more than 100 miles away. Each of the 46 participants was simultaneously rated by both the IP and TR practitioner, who were masked to each other's results. The IP-TR raters demonstrated excellent interrater reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91 for the total FEW-C and 0.96, 0.88, and 0.90 for the constructs of independence, safety, and quality, respectively. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) was 0.94 for the total FEW-C tool and 0.91, 0.83, and 0.82 for independence, safety, and quality, respectively, indicating good internal consistency without redundancy. Using TR and the FEW-C, an expert practitioner more than 100 miles away was able to accurately assess the functional mobility needs of clients being assessed for new wheeled mobility devices.
本研究探讨了亲自实施轮椅功能日常活动能力评估量表(FEW-C)的全科医生与在100多英里外通过远程康复(TR)进行观察的远程专家医生之间的评分者间信度。46名参与者均由亲自实施评估的医生和远程观察的医生同时进行评分,且双方对彼此的评分结果均不知情。亲自实施评估的医生与远程观察的医生之间表现出了出色的评分者间信度,FEW-C总分的组内相关系数为0.91,独立性、安全性和质量维度的组内相关系数分别为0.96、0.88和0.90。FEW-C工具总分的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数)为0.94,独立性、安全性和质量维度的内部一致性分别为0.91、0.83和0.82,表明内部一致性良好且无冗余。通过使用远程康复和FEW-C,100多英里外的专家医生能够准确评估正在接受新型轮式移动设备评估的客户的功能移动需求。